Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Bennett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Bennett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bennett was a hockey player who once was thought to had promise, but it never panned out. Hockey is a bit hard to navigate for those of us used to Gridiron football, where when they draft you it means you are going on their team. In the NFL drafting means they are using you as back stock, so it is common to draft someone and then have them go to college. That is what happened here. The coverage of his career at Boston was routine. The coveage of his leaving Boston was routine. The coverage of his career at the University of Wisconsin was not even that. I checked, but the article seems to be right in identifying when he last played a public hockey game. He was a college sportsman who does not meet any of the inclusion requirements for college sportsmen. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Relisting comment – For whatever reason, this discussion was listed on the 8 September 2016 AfD log page (diff), despite the nomination being created on 10 September 2016 (link). At this point, it seems best retain the relisting on the present September 16 ‎AfD log page (diff). As such, note that this discussion has actually only been listed for deletion for a total of six days at this point (after 14:07 UTC time today). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY BlackAmerican (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The nominator makes a very good case, and I would like to thank him for letting us know the difference between hockey and football in this respect, as otherwise I might have !voted keep based on the draft. Fieari (talk) 04:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.