Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain to height ratio curve
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. 17:13, 26 June 2009 UninvitedCompany (talk | contribs) deleted "Brain to height ratio curve" (Blatant hoax) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Brain to height ratio curve (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Google is silent about Ruben Von Gritz. No medical study needs 500,000 participants. The curve is exceedingly suspicious. Etc. I suggest hoax. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was just about to nominate this myself. It's either a hoax or unpublished research, and in either case the article must go. There is possibly some valuable background material, but it can't justify keeping a bogus article. Looie496 (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm siding more with the original research argument, but this doesn't belong. - 2 ... says you, says me 16:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A definite hoax. Stick a bit of nonsense and a silly graph at the top of the article and then put real medical stuff (taken from other wikipedia articles) down the rest of the page. Polargeo (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. If no references can be found for the 500,000 person study, there's something wrong - that would be covered someplace, for sure. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.