Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Flowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Notability established per the sources provided. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Flowers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mr. Flowers does appear to have attracted dedicated coverage in independent, reliable sources on at least a few occasions (1, 2, 3, 4). Marginal, but I lean keep. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources noted above by Ganesha811 are enough to pass WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG, as they all have significant coverage of the subject. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 17:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not finding reliable sources for this local artist. Removed stale link farm of external links. ABC and the Advocate cover local kerfuffle. Fails WP:ARTIST --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep*- he seems notable with sources cited above Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 07:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per notability. Mutual United Ltd (talk) 22:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.