Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Padarath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. $Salvio giuliano$ 23:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Padarath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the subject of this article meets WP:NCRIME. They weren't elected, so they wouldn't meet the SNG for NPOL. I haven't seen anything in my BEFORE that would indicate adequate WP:GNG coverage that could be used to write a more typical biography. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Politics, and Oceania. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG, NCRIME, and BIO. BIO1E where most of the article is unsourced. BEFORE showed routine local news, nothing that meets SIGCOV. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 16:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.