Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balaichak Raja Rammohan Vidyapith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Balaichak Raja Rammohan Vidyapith

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two government database listings aside(which proves that the school exists)...no sources were found. — F R ⁺ 06:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as we just don't have enough source material to base an article on, let alone to demonstrate notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DEL8, no significant coverage found, fails GNG. Sam Sailor 08:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a secondary school which is proven to exist. We keep such schools. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Schools Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it is not even listed in the Hooghly district#Education section which states there are 408 high schools in the district. If someone wants to make a List of schools in Hooghly district, then that can attract such a redirect. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, but if not Delete. per above and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Wpgbrown ^{talk | contribs} 11:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If it is valid, as per consensus on school outcomes, we keep such articles. Singling out non-anglophone schools for deletion propagates systemic bias.Egaoblai (talk) 11:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The sources presented are but lists of high schools and directory entries. There is no coverage beyond that to indicate a separate article should be created. So it should go to the list until such significant coverage is presented. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.