Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azarenka–S. Williams rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Azarenka–S. Williams rivalry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NSPORTS "Sports rivalries are not inherently notable." Tennis guidelines say the same. There seems to be a steady stream of these rivalry pages lately. Tennis is a sport that inherently has players near the same ranking playing each other on a regular basis. See also WTA Big Three and Azarenka–Sharapova rivalry for other recent arrivals. We've had deletions already for Agassi–Rafter rivalry, Davenport–V. Williams rivalry, Davenport–Hingis rivalry, Becker–Sampras rivalry, etc... It's one thing to list this on a page like List of tennis rivalries, but to make a separate article seems like a poor choice to me. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Azarenka didn't reach the top until fairly recently, and a head-to-head record of 1-11 isn't a rivalry, it's a domination. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They've met in one Grand Slam final. Way off from being notable. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 08:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not a particularly notable rivalry that is frequently discussed as such in reliable media. Does not meet the 'significant media coverage ' requirement, see WP:TENNIS Article Guidelines.--Wolbo (talk) 13:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.