Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Albarran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Albarran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopelessly incompetent translation from the Portuguese. Listed on Pages Needed translation since April without response. No point in draftifying, as the creator is a SPA, the editor who accepted it from AfC has been blocked as a sockpuppet, the article is highly promotional , and the individual only marginally notable DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I rewrote the article, and I don't think the current version is promotional. This person is a celebrity journalist who has been covered by a variety of media over the years, including his work as CEO of an investment company that ultimately collapsed and surviving leukemia. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• keep---✨LazyManiik✨ 08:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user Lazy Maniik. ✗plicit 14:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• keep- there are a few articles about him. Meets notability. Peter303x (talk) 18:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Striking blocked sock. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep current article is suitable for Wikipedia. Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the sources currently cited appear to push the topic beyond WP:BASIC. feminist (t) 05:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.