Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armin Hodžić (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Armin Hodžić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined on the grounds that he has now played in the Bosnian top flight. Given that this league is not fully pro playing in it does not confer notability per WP:NSPORT and he has not received sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Top flight players in Ireland and Latvia AREN'T notable. While this may well be an example of WP:BIAS, I'm afraid that's systemic around here. You either need to provide evidence that the league is fully professional, or significant media coverage of this particular player. Nfitz (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. You say "Stop just quoting policies and use your brain instead". Actually, the reason we use policies is because they are the result of many people's brains being used in careful thought: "policy" here means "stuff that a lot of smart people have thought about carefully". I agree that in this case the policy seems odd, but the best way to deal with this would be to seek to change the policy. RomanSpa (talk) 03:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A policy that some of us very much don't support, and would happily change - at least for countries like Ireland, Latvia, and Bosnia ... I'm not quite sold on the top league in the Pitcairn Islands ... Nfitz (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.