Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Ryker
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrew Ryker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Rykerbomb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Contested prod. Subject is American wrestler. I believe the subject is a minor wrestler not notable enough for inclusion. Fails WP:ATH and WP:BIO as he has not received significant coverage from reliable sources. SPA. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - the WWE section is totally over the top making it look like he was more than a paid local who did odd jobs here and there. MPJ -DK 19:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Under G11. This is a blatant promotional article and probably in violation of WP:VAIN and WP:COI as well. Was previously deleted by prod in 2007 after his supposed WWE dark match. AinslieL (talk) 10:25, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - per Ainslie. !! Justa Punk !! 23:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete You bet this is blatant promotion! RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 03:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.