Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Klemensson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anders Klemensson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to two appearances in an allegedly 'fully professional league' four years ago. The rest of his football career has been at a much lower level and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we really need to change the football notability guidelines so they better predict that people who pass will meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GiantSnowman and the guidelines' failure.Less Unless (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.