Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amitabh Vijayvargiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While no sources have been raised for WP:GNG here, there is a strong consensus that sources exist. Considering the article was only created this month, WP:NEXIST is a reasonable argument. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 08:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amitabh Vijayvargiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, nothing significant in searches, fails WP:GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 16:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Tentative Keep but needs better sourcing. Not only played first class, but was afterwards coach of the Madhya Pradesh team, secretary of the MP cricket association, and now chairman of the MP senior team selection committee[1]. Things like this clearly suggest attention for the person, but I haven't been able to find truly indepth coverage of him so far. Fram (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Someone playing that number of games will likely have coverage either offline or in Indian sources. His post career looks to have gained hime some notability as well. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Easy keep here. Nearly 50 first-class matches and his post-playing career seems notable. Coverage undoubtedly exists in offline news sources, if not online ones too, but Hindi isn't my strongpoint! StickyWicket (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it is reasonable to expect coverage because cricketers with that many first-class matches usually pass WP:GNG. There is no urgency for expansion. Störm (talk) 07:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Played in 38 F/C games in a career that spanned almost a decade. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep 45 qualifying matches, over 2k FC runs, HS of 142. Coverage will likely be offline, as his career finished in 1994. DevaCat1 (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is famous.--MadD ^(talk) 11:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per my comments at Dinkar Deshpande below. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note to Closer: Please consider WP:NSPORTS, which is meant to help evaluate whether or not a subject is likely to have enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Playing a certain number of games does not establish notability, and no significant coverage has been found. –dlthewave ☎ 14:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No Men Are Allowed (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because notable cricketer. Riteboke (talk) 08:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.