Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus arguments on both side are week and don't explain what the mean by their comments. If someone thinks this should be deleted still, consider sending it to AfD again in a month or so TonyBallioni (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Information about this person should be in the article of the actual controversy of Jyllands-Posten cartoons. I have added the information to the timeline of that article, so this page is now redundant. Elektricity (talk) 03:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MTTrain^Discuss 06:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. MTTrain^Discuss 06:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MTTrain^Discuss 06:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect (no, at least at this moment in time, it is not in Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy). Also possible to rename article to Die-Welt 2006 attack or something similar. The incident is notable (though mergeable), the WP:PERP is known only in connection to this crime - carrying it out and dying in custody.Icewhiz (talk) 06:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC) Modified below.Icewhiz (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added it to the timeline. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy#20_March Elektricity (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - OP also removed information from the article prior to nomming. Specifically, the funeral of the subject, attended by over 30,000 people, meets event notability and confers notability on the subject in addition to the actual Die Welt attack. Coverage is definitely persistent and significant.Icewhiz (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per WP:PERSISTENCE WP:SIGCOV and WP:GOLDENRULE. This article merits a space on the encylopedia. Celestina007 (talk) 08:34, 01 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it as this meets WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of this rises above general news coverage. This might be worth a general comment in an article on crazed attacks against freedom of expression, but it does not merit a stand alone article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GNG, WP:PERSISTENCE as per continued coverage.BabbaQ (talk) 11:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete / redirect to Timeline_of_the_Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy#20_March per WP:BLP1E. The attendance at the funeral does not amount to encyclopedia notability. In any case, this topic is already sufficiently covered in the target article, and stand-alone article is not required. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c)  12:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable person. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Fails GNG. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.