Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Vision Windows (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- American Vision Windows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is corporate advertising. It was kept at the first AfD on the basis of the promise of the admitted COI contributor to improve the article. There's been work on it since, but it's no better. It continued to promote the religious influences of the founder for the success of this quite small $40 million business. There has been some press attention, but it is on peripheral aspects, and the article presents it in a way that makes it advertising for the company, based on the stories of individual employees--the History section consists of the most trivial imaginable material. . Promotional articles that in practice cannot be improved should be deleted. I started a rewrite myself, but the promotional content is intertwined with the entire article in a way that makes it unimprovable. DGG ( talk ) 22:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I declined this AfC submission but eventually agreed that I might be wrong on the premise that there was (some) scholarly material about the company, but that has now been snowed under in promotional material. Mduvekot (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.