User talk:Vexations/Archive 7
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
14:33:20, 15 August 2016 review of submission by Dmulan123
Hello, Thank you for your review. I have answered the inquiry raised on my draft article.
I see that the article was rejected on a lack of notability. "Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - But I have quoted many citations in leading publications (Wall Street Journal, NY Times, TechCrunch, Conde Nast, LA Times, etc), all of which are independent of the subject. Why does it still lack notability? Dmulan123 (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Dmulan123
- Hi Dmulan, I can see that my cookie-cutter reply may not be very helpful. Sorry about that. Notability is not just coverage in independent, reliable sources, but also has to be significant. The New York Times is sometimes considered our gold standard for coverage in a newspaper, but not everything the NYT publishes automatically confers notability on a subject. A restaurant review in the NYT for example, is probably not enough to make a restaurant notable. My concern with the sources that you have cited was that the coverage is not in-depth, and in some cases just repeats what the Suiteness website states, in a way a regurgitated press release. The purpose of reviewing articles at WP:AfC is to identify which submissions will be deleted and which won't. I think that the article, in its current state, and given the sources that exist, the article would likely be deleted at WP:AfD. There is, of course, the possibility that I am wrong, which is why I probably won't be reviewing (and rejecting) the article again, unless there is a significant improvement that prompts me to accept it. If you are interested in becoming a Wikipedia editor, I would recommend that you try improving other articles first, before writing a full article. If you enjoy writing about businesses you may find Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies of interest. If you are only interested in creating an article about your employer, you would be considered a Single-purpose account, and I would suggest that you abandon the effort. All the best, Mduvekot (talk) 15:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
21:01:11, 15 August 2016 review of submission by Mredmail
This page looks to be comparable in content to other figures in the classical music field like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Bernstein. What would you suggest is the primary issue to change on this article?
Mredmail (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Mredmail, when comparing articles it is important to note that other stuff exists. The Bernstein article is currently rated as B-class. For an example of what Wikipedia's editors consider our best work on composers, have a look at WP:WikiProject_Composers#Featured_articles. My assessment of the similarity between the Bernstein article and the one on Bayard is that they differ significantly in important ways. One important issue with Draft:Michael_Alden_Bayard is the tone. For example, "master drummer", is not neutral, "percussionist" is, so that should be used instead. "under the batons of numerous notable conductors" is peacock language; it offers no useful information, but makes him sound important. Other examples of promotional language are "legendary", "prolific", "numerous", "unprecedented", "groundbreaking", "ancient spiritual wisdom". That's just from the first four paragraphs, for which you provide one source, an article in the Sacramento Bee that is behind a paywall. In my view, the article is not written in a neutral tone, and poorly supported by independent, reliable sources.
- I note that the article was created by a user, PureMotionMedia who has been blocked for spamming, and has tried to argue that he "chose PuremMotionmMedia as [his] username because [he] wanted to write posts with the purest facts in media and music" even though we notice that his username is the same as the label that Voice of the Wind was released on. I also notice that your first contributions were made on 14 June 2016, days after PureMotionMedia ceased contributing on 3 June 2016, and that both you and PureMotionMedia have only ever significantly contributed to Draft:Michael Alden Bayard (yes, there are some edits to his collaborator Mary Youngblood where information about Bayard was added [1] , and an attempt to add a link to their website [2]). I think that this might be a good time to remind you that if you have a relationship to Bayard, you may have a conflict of interest, and I encourage you to review our guideline on conflict of interest editing. I also feel compelled to let you know that I consider it entirely possible, though not proven at this point, that you may have a relationship to PureMotionMedia, and you ought to be made aware of our policy on sock-puppetry. Mduvekot (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #222
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- New request for comments: Data quality framework for Wikidata
- Events/Blogs/Press
- Past: Wikidata-Hackathon (topic was SPARQL) in München on 11th of August
- Upcoming: a Wikidata workshop in French will be conducted by Ash Crow and Harmonia Amanda during the French-speaking Wikiconvention on 21st August 2016 in Paris
- History of Parliament and Wikidata – the first round complete
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Léa joins the team as Community Communication Manager for Wikidata
- ArticlePlaceholder is now live on Welsh and Kannada Wikipedia
- You can now render sparql queries using the Histropedia timeline engine. Example : Structures in London, colour coded by heritage status
Structures in London on Histropedia - The Wikidata image search tool can now show Commons images around items (example)
- Job offer : Textmining, Hochschule Hannover
- New templates: {{Australia properties}}, {{Indonesia properties}}, {{United Kingdom properties}}. Please add labels in your own languages, and consider making a similar template for your country or region. Also, add P17-statements to property entities.
- UK Imperial War Museum's War Memorials Register has been added to Mix'n'Match
- Did you know?
- Newest properties: SIMBAD ID, destroyed, damaged, game artist, standard enthalpy of formation, Cineplex film ID, Open Beauty Facts category ID, official religion, Grace's Guide ID, CosIng number, Storting person ID, standard molar entropy, dynamic viscosity, UN document symbol, WIPO ST.3, GS1 country code, GLAM ID, RERO ID, LepIndex ID, gestation period, Basisregistratie Instellingen number, ButMoth ID, Architectuurgids building ID, Architectuurgids architect ID, Charity Commission no., Turner Classic Movies person ID, NAQ elected person ID, Ontario MPP ID, K League player ID, Bloomberg person ID, Kindred Britain ID, CMFS player ID, Scottish FA player ID, racing-reference driver ID, footballzz ID, Fora De Jogo player ID, HanCinema person ID, College Football HoF ID, scoresway soccer person id, CageMatch wrestling stable id, luminous intensity, SoundCloud ID
- Query examples: 2016 Olympics flag bearers (source), Composer that scored more than 100 films (source), churches using the same image (source), Challenge: Find a class with more fictional instances than real ones (source), items on human genes with unreferenced statements (source), Women elected to the UK Paliament (via WD:RAQ), Treaties of Paris (source), fictional thoroughfares (source), map of sports teams, with layers for different sports (source), big cities grouped into map layers by population (source), Free software with/without license (source), treaties with/without a date (source), capitals that aren’t capitals (soure), works of art depicting many people (source)
- Development
- mw:Wikibase/DataModel/JSON#time was revised, clarifying the use for dates before year 1.
- Language code "non" for Old Norse is now available for monolingual text (phabricator:T137115)
- Worked more on better visual layout of references (phabricator:T141862)
- Fixed issue with references not being expanded in diff view (phabricator:T129836)
- Added link to Wikidata item from ArticlePlaceholder (phabricator:T126873)
- Enabled ArticlePlaceholder on knwiki and cywiki
- Removed collapsing behaviour from error messages (phabricator:T141879)
- Started writing out next steps for how to use Wikidata items and properties on Commons
- Drafting interface stability policy (phabricator:T142084)
- Worked more in making it possible to create mediainfo entities by adding a statement to a non-existing one (phabricator:T140760)
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Help merge identical items across Wikimedia projects.
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
- Comment on property proposals: all open proposals - proposals needing attention
Ron Murdock Draft
Hello Mduvekot, I saw that you reviewed the draft I wrote for an article on Ron Murdock. Thank you for the work! You notified that there was a dead link in the article. I didn’t see that, but just discovered there was a slash too many. I inserted the right url, which should work now. Also, I added some extra info. Could you please tell me whether this version can be approved? Thanks a lot, Johan Aanen —Preceding undated comment added 20:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello @J. Aanen:, my apologies for my delayed response, I have been travelling without internet access. Please note that I am not the only reviewer for this article. Feel free to resubmit (press the blue button) if you feel that it is ready to be reviewed again, and it will go back into the pool of articles to be reviewed. I would suggest that you may want to try to find more sources, add some wikilinks, and work on critical reception of Murdock's work. Has his book been reviewed, for example? There are still many unsourced statements, like his winning the CNR trophy, and the prize money at the New Glasgow Music Festival early in the article. All the best, Mduvekot (talk) 11:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello @Mduvekot::, No problem. I had a break as well, hence my late answer. Thanks a lot for letting me know what you think's still missing. I'll try to find more sources, or else remove some info from the article. The first three sources I refer to are reviews. I'll make this more explicit so that's clearer to the readers. Best regards! Johan
14:21:52, 17 August 2016 review of submission by Aftab hussain shahnawaz
Hi. I was hoping to get some clarification on the article that you declined, Mohammed Bawazir for Trading Co. Ltd. Is the entire article not written in a formal enough tone or is it the use or peacock terms that made you decline the article? I've gone through and removed phrases like the one you pointed out, or revised them to include fact rather than just be a statement. Please let me know if there is more than just peacock terms so that I can revise better. I was surprised that this article was flagged as informal since I had worked with an administrator previously (outside of writing an article in Draft) and revised the article to be more formal with him. I just want to make sure that I get this article right. Thank you for your time. Aftab hussain shahnawaz (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Aftab hussain shahnawaz: You removed the sentence I cited as an example of promotional language. Thank you for that. You did not edit the remainder of the article, however, and some non-neutral language remains. I think it is often difficult to see what other editors readily identify as promotional, especially if you have a relationship with the subject. Do you have a relationship to Mohammed Bawazir for Trading Co. Ltd.? If so, you may have a conflict of interest. Please see WP:COI. all the best, Mduvekot (talk) 18:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Mduvekot: I read the article that you gave me earlier and have revised again looking for additional non-neutral language. At this point, I am unsure if the tone is what the problem is or I am still using peacock or biased verbs. I've tried to keep it to simple facts, as if I was writing a college paper or Newspaper article (I've done both). Is it full sentences that are promotional or simple vocabulary terms that I'm missing during edits? Or do I just need to rewrite the entire thing again? And no, I am not associated with the company. I did, however, read up on the company website to find a full list of brands and subcompanies. Thanks again. Aftab hussain shahnawaz (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Aftab hussain shahnawaz: Thank you for the clarification of your (non) association with the company. I suggest that you resubmit the article for review so another reviewer can take a look at the article. Mduvekot (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Mduvekot: Thank you for your help!Aftab hussain shahnawaz (talk) 02:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Aftab hussain shahnawaz: Thank you for the clarification of your (non) association with the company. I suggest that you resubmit the article for review so another reviewer can take a look at the article. Mduvekot (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Mduvekot: I read the article that you gave me earlier and have revised again looking for additional non-neutral language. At this point, I am unsure if the tone is what the problem is or I am still using peacock or biased verbs. I've tried to keep it to simple facts, as if I was writing a college paper or Newspaper article (I've done both). Is it full sentences that are promotional or simple vocabulary terms that I'm missing during edits? Or do I just need to rewrite the entire thing again? And no, I am not associated with the company. I did, however, read up on the company website to find a full list of brands and subcompanies. Thanks again. Aftab hussain shahnawaz (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Request on 18:11:00, 17 August 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Varsika
Hello,
I've seen you declined th article and you had two arguments. One was that the sources did not support the notability and you mentioned one reference as the best example in the whole article. It was quite hard to find sources, because first of all the article is about a Georgian man and most of the sources are in Georgian. Secondly Wikipedia does not accept references from very popular sources like IMDB for example or the sources which come from the companies linked to this person. I still managed to find some foreign articles. One reference was from the official website of Russian President. kremlin.ru is the official website of Russian President, you didn't like it and that's what actually surprises me the most. As if you were saying to me that the information on the website of White House is not enough to support the notability. That reference was saying that Avtandil Varsimashvili has been awarded with Russia's honorary medal. I think you agree with the fact, that if a foreign national is awarded with the honorary medal, he is notable. Like if a guy from Mexico is awarded by US President, that means he is notable.
As for trivial information, yes I agree there are some. For example I can remove all the info about family. Also I can remove the info about awards, most of them are unknown for the broad public. Tell me what esle do you think I should remove.
Best,
George
Varsika (talk) 18:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Varsika: The Order of Friendship is itself a notable award, and some the recipients are unquestionably notable. So that may very well contribute to his notability. I also don't question that the Kremlin has indeed award the honours if it says so. However, the citation that supports that claim, does not say very much about Varsimashvili. The factual claims in the article need to be supported by citations. Those citations need to be significant, and from independent, reliable sources. Note that citations don't have to be in English. If they are in Georgian or Russian, that would be acceptable. All the best, Mduvekot (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hello again. I see what you mean, but the citation actually says the reason A. Varsimashvili received the award. It says: "The theatre’s artistic director, Avtandil Varsimashvili, actress Irina Megvinetukhutsesi, actor Valery Kharyutchenko and general director Nikolai Sventitsky have all been awarded the decoration by decree of the Russian President for their great contribution to developing and strengthening cultural ties between Russia and Georgia." I think in this case the article confirms the fact and the reason the award was given. What esle should it say more? You also said that I could have articles in Russian and Georgian, but your previous colleague said exactly the opposite and I had to remove all the articles, which were in Georgian and Russian. Here is the Russian version of Kremlin's web page regarding Varsimashvili. Can I include it? http://special.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/24210
- I removed some trivial info and with these new changes, I'll resubmit the article. If you have other suggestions, please don't hesitate to tell me.
- Varsika
- @Varsika: I don't see any of the reviewers telling you that you can't use Russian sources, buf you need clarification on the use of non-english sources, you can find it in a subsection of our verifiability policy, at Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English_sources Mduvekot (talk) 15:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Varsika
10:57:42, 21 August 2016 review of submission by CreativeCypher16
I am an independent contractor for Mr. Troy Pryor. I retrieved valid references to aid in his wikipedia entry page as a notable producer. I don't want to resubmit if the page still needs work after the changes I've made from the last declined submission. This is my first time formatting a Wikipedia page.
- If you are being paid by the subject of the article, you have a conflict of interest. Please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.Mduvekot (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Mduvekot: I am not being paid by the subject of the article. There is no conflict of interest involved in this case. CreativeCypher16 (talk) 11:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- @CreativeCypher16: Perhaps I misunderstood you. You just wrote that you are an independent contractor for Mr Pryor. Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial or other relationships. Mduvekot (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
07:48:19, 23 August 2016 review of submission by Richard Ammer
Dear reviewer, I kindly ask for more in depth feedback on why the submission is being declined over and over again and how we can improve it so that it is published. There is a German Wikipedia entry about MEDICE on the German Wikipedia and basically the English version is a translation of this and gives even more information and contains more references. We are referring to third party sources (books, websites, articles) as requested, have not written an advertorial text, but still we always receive the feedback that the submission has been declined, but we are not given any detailed information, but always the same phrases - submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability - it reads more like an advertorial Thank you very much for your feedback.
- Dear @Richard Ammer: I thought I was quite specific with my feedback. I gave an example of the kind of phrase that I thought was promotional and I mentioned that you might have a conflict of interest. Did you notice the comment section below the big box of standard wording? Mduvekot (talk) 10:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #223
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- Open request for adminship: ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2
- Closed request for comments:
- Category commons P373 and "Other sites"
- Adopt Help:Classification as an official help page
- Review of "change datatype to monolingual" actions for some properties
- Refining "part of"
- Are colors instance-of or subclass-of color
- Wikidata:Notability overhaul
- RfP voting eligibility
- Standards for property proposal discussions
- Events/Blogs/Press
- August 17-19 : VIVO conference, see also the keynote about collaboratively created, linked open knowledge.
- August 20-21 : the Wikiconvention in Paris. Check the notes taken during the Wikidata workshop
- Why you should be paying attention to Wikidata and GLAM, on the Wikimedia Foundation blog
- All your locations are belong to us on Magnus' blog
- Paper: An Empirical Evaluation of Property Recommender Systems for Wikidata and Collaborative Knowledge Bases
- Paper: Managing and Consuming Completeness Information for Wikidata Using COOL-WD
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Job offer : PHP software developer for Wikidata, Wikimedia Deutschland
- Wikidata has now a stable interface policy to guarantee the stability of the tools
- Enabling Wikidata data access in user language
- COOL-WD now includes a gadget to show completeness information in Wikidata
- Mix'n'Match can list entries of some external databases, and allows users to match them against Wikidata items. A new catalogue for ContentMine has been added!
- WikiShootMe has a lot of new updates: OAuth-based image upload button, uploads to Commons and adds to Wikidata item with one click, right-click on the map to add a missing item, build-in Wikidata search, free images search (example for Central Cambridge)
- Extracting Wikidata annotations to create DBpedia mappings project during Google Summer of Code
- Did you know?
Popular surnames among humans - Newest properties: develops from, recovered by, film crew member, mount, flight number, Flags of the World ID, ID of Catalogue of Life in Taiwan, fiscal/tax revenue, speed limit, qualifies for event, freedom of panorama
- Query examples:
- A famous Italian song, Tanti Auguri by Raffaella Carrà, states "Com'è bello far l'amore da Trieste in giù" (literally, in English: "How great it is to make love from Trieste to below"). This is a query to find out where you shouldn't make love.
- Common occupations of heads of state (source).
- Murderers by region in France (source).
- Authors with a known location and an ORCID (source).
- Popular surnames among humans (source).
- Movies that won all the Oscars they were nominated for (source).
- Colors with multiple RGB statements (source)
- Filmography of Jean Gabin (source)
- Cities as big as Antwerp (source)
- Cities connected by the Trans-Mongolian and Trans-Siberian Railway (source)
- Histropedia timeline of Europeana280 artworks (source)
- Newest gadgets: Sort the statements on items, prefill "access date" with current date
- New templates: {{Belgium properties}}, {{France properties}}, {{Italy properties}}, {{Spain properties}}. Please add labels in your own languages, and consider making a similar template for your country or region. Also, add P17-statements to property entities.
- Newest database reports: list of riders and their horse
- Development
- Continuing to work on the concepts for the automatic list generation
- Enable allow data access in user language will come on Wikidata soon
- Menus are now internationalised on the query service
- Clarified error message when adding a URL without a protocol
- Created a gadget to try out global sort order in items
- Fixed a bug where the input field for a value was not loaded
- Worked on the interface stability policy
- Made possible to create mediainfo entity by adding a statement
- Worked on showing from which items a given Wikipedia article uses data
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Help merge identical items across Wikimedia projects.
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
- Comment on property proposals: all open proposals - proposals needing attention
Hey excuse me thanks for the constructive criticism, how can I help to improve the article so that nothing in it reads like an advertisement? I personally don't understand because I referred to the sources as objectively as possible; and the article talks about all sides of the story: an advertisement wouldn't talk about diffused divisions nor the decreasing and fluctuating revenue. I modified the article to correct any errors of tone and then it was said my work paid off. I just want to know what should be corrected and what I could do to help. Thank you. SWAloha (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hey I just wanted to add that I completely understand why you guys delete so many company drafts - it's pretty bad. But I'm a serious editor, I am not an advertiser. I'm trying to make an article. SWAloha (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Michiel. I would be also interested in why you declined this draft- you said promotional language (without leaving a comment), but I don't know whether you saw or not, but I did leave a comment following up from my initial decline saying that I thought the promotional language evident from the first draft has been edited out. jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- @SWAloha and Jcc:I was too quick. After looking at the academic sources in depth, I'm much more inclined to accept the article. I'd recommend that you focus on those. Mduvekot (talk) 10:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay so I'm definately going to expand upon the academic sources as suggested. Then I will submit it again. SWAloha (talk) 23:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Academic sources has been elaborated upon SWAloha (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcc and Mduvekot: Draft has been submitted SWAloha (talk)
Your comment on Draft:Heartfulness meditation
Thanks for the pointer on Draft:Heartfulness meditation, I have removed the statement that lacked citation. Also I have removed your comment from the draft. Duty2love (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Duty2love: I wish you hadn't removed my comment. That comment wasn't just for you to deal with a specific quote, but pointed out to reviewers that the article contains statements that are not supported by the cited sources. I can make that clearer if you like, or decline the article on the grounds that the submission is improperly sourced. Many of the sources do not say what is paraphrased in the article. Sometimes that's a case of WP:SYNTH, sometimes it's inserting a POV. Anyway, I'd recommend that you review your sources and make sure you accurately paraphrase and attribute what they say. Mduvekot (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Cees Links page
Hi Michiel,
Ivm de draft page van Cees Links die u ge-reviewed hebt: ik ben echt "totally at loss". Cees Links' pagina heeft referenties de verifiable zijn (de meest erken industry magazines en video op Bloomberg, TwiTTV, etc). Uw vraag over "welk bedrijf" wordt uitgebreid aangekaart on het kopje "career".
Ik heb echt geen idee hoe ik dit verder kan optuigen, daar de referenties kegit zijn. Uw hulp zou zeer gewaardeerd zijn om Cees Links als nederlandse technologie pioneer een welverdiende plaatsop Wikipedia te geven.
Groeten,
Ellyschietse (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Elly SchietseEllyschietse (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Ellyschietse: Als Links betrokken was bij de ontwikkeling van WaveLAN (en daarover zou de draft echt wel wat duidelijker kunnen zijn) dan moet aan bronnen worden gerefereerd, die dat bevestigen. Mduvekot (talk) 11:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #224
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- We need your input about how you edit lists on Wikipedia
- Events/Press/Blogs
- Upcoming: First Wikidata workshop in the Czech Republic, 3rd September, University of Pardubice
- Past: Wikidata workshop by Asaf Bartov during the CEE WikiConv in Dilijan, Armenia
- Past: Wikidata presentation during Django Girls in Berlin
- GSoC at Wikimedia (Part 1 of 3), by Alangi Derick
- Modeling books in Wikidata by Aubrey and Chiara Storti
- Paper: Vandalism Detection in Wikidata, by Stefan Heindorf, Martin Potthast, Benno Stein and Gregor Engels
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Planet to Earth: this tool uses data from Wikidata to visualise the links between places on an astronomical body named after a place on planet Earth.
- WikiDataScape is a Cytoscape app for interactive browsing of Wikidata.
- The property "KML file" was created last week (see list below) and has already a full list of values, sample LUA module and property documentation page available (Property talk:P3096)
- enabling data access in user language will be deployed on Wikidata on August 29
- Did you know?
- Newest properties: Tela Botanica ID (Metropolitan France), Gare & Connexions ID, has tense, Plantarium ID, FloraBase ID, Flora of Australia ID, Internet Bird Collection species ID, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, ISBN identifier group, KML file, practiced by
- Query examples:
- RADA alumni with a good or featured article on Wikipedia (source)
- Historians with links to French Wikipedia or Wikisource, but missing VIAF ID (source)
- Unicorn taxa, including the Indian rhinoceros (source)
- Mithras shrines, as a map (source)
- 2.300 Wikidata archaeological sites without coordinates (source)
- All items on Wikidata whom we know we don't know their sex or gender: (source)
- Drug-disease interactions (source)
- Nicknames of serial killers (source)
- Dynamic data map of all U-bahn lines in Berlin with colors (source)
- Timeline of internet services by type to celebrate 25 yrs of the web (source)
- Network of color (source)
- Dynamic data map of all country by year of joining the United Nations (source)
- Newest WikiProjects: Theatre
- Newest gadgets:
- Newest external tools: Wikidata Class Browser (includes subclass counts and instance counts)
- Newest database reports:
- New feature/gadget requests:
- Showcase items:
- Development
- Fixed a but where the text field doesn't always load when trying to add a statement (phabricator:T115267)
- We're now also creating mediainfo entities when a statement is added to a non-existent media info entity (phabricator:T140760)
- Fixed a but where the suggester would show information twice (phabricator:T143645)
- The ArticlePlaceholder now also shows the links to other projects in the In Other Projects sidebar (phabricator:T141771)
- Worked more in figuring out how to show usage tracking data (phabricator:T103091)
- Made progress on Citoid support for Wikidata to make it easier to add useful and complete references (phabricator:T141856)
- Worked on restore "purge without confirm" user right (phabricator:T143435)
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Help merge identical items across Wikimedia projects.
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
- Comment on property proposals: all open proposals - proposals needing attention
09:32:02, 30 August 2016 review of submission by 2.28.152.66
- 2.28.152.66 (talk · contribs)
- @Americasmostblunted and 2.28.152.66: I'll give you an example: You cite https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/seller-profile?id=39dcde3e-e442-4104-8d09-ae5f689907ee which says: "Our principal activities are the development and sale of Application Release Automation software and the provision of associated support and related services. We are a founder led, private business with a blue chip product pedigree combined with start-up agility, driving rapid innovation even relative to an emerging market. We are already achieving major global progress both in respect of our customer successes and our partnership successes." In no way is that an independent, reliable source. Mduvekot (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Americasmostblunted (talk • contribs) 10:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Americasmostblunted: No, you should still not use primary sources, especially if they're your own marketing copy. But more importantly, now that you've mentioned it: If you refer to MidVision as "we", you have a conflict of interest. We strongly discourage writing article about yourself or your company. Mduvekot (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi! thanks for your comment on Sharon Christian
Hi Michiel,
thanks for chiming in on the Sharon Christian debate. I appreciate your input -- I'm finding the process of creating and editing this page to be much more stressful than I had thought it would be. It seems as if there is a deep ignorance about primary research among many of the editors: the notion that all evidence on someone would be "pretty easy" to find with simple internet searches is so frankly wrong, it's hard for me to trust a process that endows people who hold this position. If the Christian site is taken down I will be disappointed, mostly because I had thought that wikipedia was moving towards a more rigorous and deeper model of research. It sounds like you have more experience than most in terms of editing wiki pages. If you can help in any way, I'd be most appreciative.
Best wishes
Icareaboutart (talk) 14:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Icareaboutart, I'm not sure I agree that we "endow" people who hold that evidence is easy to find. Verifiability is a pillar of Wikipedia, and it's of the utmost importance that we get it right. I think we're quite open to all kinds of evidence, not just URLs to easy to verify factoids. Sources can be hard-to-find books in languages other than English, paywalled journal, etc. and we tend to assume good faith that those sources were cited correctly.
- I've found that people who start writing, and then look for sources to back up statements they know to be true have a much harder time than people who start with the sources and leave out statements until they can source them. Sometimes it can be a real challenge to uncover a source, and for me, that's part of why I enjoy editing Wikipedia. Specialized libraries are fantastic resources. The AGO library in Toronto, where I live, has been incredibly helpful and supportive. They have "vertical files", where the collect pretty much anything that's published about Canadian artists. We've found old magazine reviews, letters, invitations, flyers, brochures that even the artists themselves didn't remember. They often have books and reference works that other libraries don't have, and they have archives of pretty much any art magazine ever published in Canada. Biographical references like the Benezit are very useful. Other sources that I often use are JStor and OneFile, that the Toronto Public Library gives free access to. I think I recall you saying you're in Vancouver. Have you considered contacting them to inquire about their artist files? [3]
- all the best,Mduvekot (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Super helpful, and thanks so much for editing the article. I now live in Washington DC, and will check out the local edit-a-thons here. Cheers, 100.15.183.136 (talk) 16:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mduvekot: article has been edited to include only verifiable sources. Thanks for your work on the article: I hope it isn't deleted. Icareaboutart (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)