Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber DeLuca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amber DeLuca

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 01:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article appears to have been largely edited by the subject, with all the attendant issues you'd expect. 2601:188:1:AEA0:54FE:11E3:7566:4F1F (talk) 01:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not really sure which sports guideline is best to apply here because she seems a jack of all trades, but since she seems to be a master of none I don't see any of them being met. At the same time "Pennsylvania State armwrestling champion 2001" might be the most impressive title I have ever seen on Wiki. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive if it could be verified :) Meatsgains (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiable or not, its a pretty great title.Thumb wrestling champ might be more impressive though... TonyBallioni (talk) 13:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Politrukki (talk) 09:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 14:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable athlete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as non-notable athlete per nominator rationale. Quis separabit? 16:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:ATH. [Belinrahs|^talktome⁄ _ididit] 06:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.