Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alix Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alix Smith

An artist with public showings, and the relevant art pages blurbs. Generally fails WP:CREATIVE though. Habanero-tan (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think the sources given in the article are enough for the subject to meet the general notability guideline and the speciifc guideline for people - they show significant coverage from reliable sources. Included are this write-up in the New York Times and this from Artnet. Guest9999 (talk) 14:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Guest9999. -- Hoary (talk) 09:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Good sourcing. first time I've heard Art Review and NYT articles described as blurbs--two NYT full articles!!-- If one is going to say such things, then no artist has sources. DGG (talk) 02:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.