Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcatel Lucent 7750 Service Router

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Alcatel-Lucent. I couldn't find a Alcatel-Lucent router's article for a merge but if someone can then this can be merged there. An article for the routers could also be created. v/r - T P 01:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alcatel Lucent 7750 Service Router

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability per WP:GNG. No signficant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested by anonymous editor. Gurt Posh (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 16:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article is less than 30 days old. Many hits when searching news. --Kvng (talk) 22:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Age of article is not relevant in deletion discussions and I only turn up 73 news hits (Is google filtering them geographically? I am in NZ.). -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't know how you calibrate these things but I consider 73 hits to be many. Policy may say that age is not a factor but common sense says this is not a clear-cut case so why the rush to delete it? --Kvng (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google, and Yahoo search, return only passing mentions. Not W:42. LES 953 (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge as usual with other Alcatel/Lucent routers. The normal solution for this typoe of article , and should have been done instead of bringing it here. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reference proves existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge or~~ keep I'm being lazy and don't have time to sort through all these, but a news archive search turns up quite a bit. [1]. A number of those links are dead and more are PR-releases, but quite a few discuss the router and it's position in the market. None seemed great after 3 minutes of looking, but many contained non-trivial information about the router and it's market role. Hobit (talk) 05:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Struck merge !vote based on Trevj source. I suspect that merging is the best way to cover the material, but it does appear to meet WP:N, so I think any merging discussion belongs on the talk page, not here. Hobit (talk) 23:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Joseph Fox 12:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or delete Nothing significant in detail in the news about the router that warrants its own page under WP:GNG --Ryan.germany (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Based on [2] and likely existence of similar coverage amongst other hits. --Trevj (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is there any chance of the Merge or ... comments being revised one way or the other? --Trevj (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge No indication of wp:notability. No references other than themselves. North8000 (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Lacks sources to establish notability for independent article. Edison (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - into a Parent Alcatel/Lucent routers article. Plenty of reviews, (more than most songs have). Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 07:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That would seem like an argument to keep, could you clarify? Hobit (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a notable Router. --Gagg me with ah spoon (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.