Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Patrick (fighter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Patrick (fighter)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON Only one appearence in a top tier event. Does not meet WP:MMANOT Peter Rehse (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's true he doesn't meet WP:NMMA and I agree it's WP:TOOSOON, but I think userfying this article would be preferable to deleting it--if somebody wants to step up and take temporary possession of it. Given that he's undefeated and won his first UFC fight, I would be surprised if he doesn't meet NMMA in the future (yes, I know that's WP:CRYSTALBALL). Papaursa (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NMMA. No problem with recreating the article when he meets WP:NMMA.Mdtemp (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Doesn't meet WP:NMMA, but with that last win he could soon be a force, it would be a good idea to userfy. LiberatorLX (talk) 11:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.