Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ala al-Maliki
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. without prejudice to a redirect if the fellow is mentioned at the target article. joe deckertalk 15:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ala al-Maliki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This unfortunate Iraqi does not satisfy WP:VICTIM. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to 2004 in Iraq.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing about his beheading rises to the level of warranting an article on him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect as per E.M.Gregory above. Agree with nom and other editor that there is not enough to warrant a standalone article. Onel5969 TT me 13:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.