Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhilesh Chaturvedi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akhilesh Chaturvedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Can't find any info on significant performances/shows in reliable sources across. Palmsandbeaches (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 05:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 05:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 05:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Surprised this wasn't A7d. Fails GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Surprised reviewing admin did not speedy delete this bad boy.Duncan079 (talk) 17:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements for all the important obvious reasons. Some WP:ROUTINE WP:MILL coverage exists and mentions in other articles that fall under WP:NOTINHERITED.   // Timothy :: talk  23:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not even close to passing notability guidelines for dancers or choreographers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.