Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Adel El Mogy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 22:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Adel El Mogy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. He was accused of a crime of administering virginity tests, and acquitted. Not notable outside this one event. Not beneficial to cover the individual for a singular event he was found not guilty of. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Tagged for CSD Zad68 (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clear delete Speedy-delete was declined. From WP:PERP: "Note: A living person accused of a crime is not guilty unless and until this is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured." And how much more so if the alleged perpetrator was actually cleared. Zad68 (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, speedy was declined only because BLP1E isn't a category that can be speedy deleted, ie: procedural decline. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—I PRODed this before it came here. Agree fully with the BLP1E and PERP concerns. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 18:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, either speedily as A7, or through this discussion. No evidence of lasting notability, fails the general notability guideline, the notability guideline for people and WP:BLP1E. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – see WP:BLPCRIME, WP:PERP, WP:BLP1E. The doctor was exonerated in court. Of course, I'm not sticking up for that court or how it metes out justice. Regardless, an article on this subject runs afoul of the three links above. Plus he fails WP:GNG outright. JFHJr (㊟) 15:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.