Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventures of Alfredo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no prejudice against recreation provided sources have been found.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adventures of Alfredo

Adventures of Alfredo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable as I found nothing better than this (The Software Encyclopedia in 1989 and Personal Computing in 1988. It's also worth noting that not only has this not changed since starting in July 2006, it seems the author's account may have been "compromised" (the few 2015 contributions are certainly of concern and I question if that was actually someone else or simply a user looking to retire). Pinging tagger The1337gamer. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. not documentable sufficiently for notability ; and , from what's in the article, I wouldnt expect anything better to be findable. DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I remember watching these on my dad's computer back in the day and they were fairly well known. It's entirely possible that sourcing does exist, but isn't available on the Internet, as some videos like this one assert that it was covered in Softdisk magazine. However without anything to back up that that this was actually covered or the depth of coverage (it could have been a brief trivial mention), there's nothing that can be done about that. If anyone can show proof of coverage then that'd be different and I'd be open to changing my opinion. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.