Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace Pijper

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Consensus of editors here, especially following the relist, is that SIGCOV is not met. My reading of the discussion is these concerns were not adequately addressed, hence closing as delete. Daniel (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ace Pijper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete, a WP:BEFORE check reveals almost entirely primary sources or routine coverage, and very little or no significant coverage. This is reflected in the article which cites only one non-primary source, which is routine coverage of an event the subject participated in. 5225C (talk • contributions) 00:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Not sure how good the check was! Typed in the name and the first five internet results are five different sources from British Speedway, Workington Speedway, Berwick Bandits, FIM and Glasgow Tigers. Other sources on the page are from the Speedway Star. None of these are Primary sources, they are some of the main Speedway websites etc. A primary source would be his own rider page like some riders have. Pyeongchang (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Note to closing admin: Pyeongchang (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
  • Keep. Articles from British Speedway, his clubs, etc. are fine for fact-checking, but are not really independent third-party coverage, and while there's not a great deal of third-party coverage around, there's enough in the Speedway Star and Polish and Netherlands media to scrape through. As a young rider who has just completed his first season of professional speedway, coverage is bound to increase over time. --Michig (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Michig (talkcontribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. (diff)[reply]
    • Articles from British Speedway, his clubs, etc. are fine for fact-checking, but are not really independent third-party coverage Agreed, that is not significant coverage and should not be relied on to establish notability 5225C (talk • contributions) 07:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Ace Pijper is a speedway rider who has just helped Glasgow Tigers to the 2023 SGB Championship title, so not sure how he can be classed as a non-notable athlete. A quick Google search shows his name appear in multiple news outlets and he has biographies on numerous speedway sites. His coverage is sure to increase as he progresses through the speedway ranks. He's also the son of Theo Pijper, another famous speedway rider. Johnny2hats2 (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Johnny2hats2 (talkcontribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. (diff)[reply]
  • Keep. Not only is the rider in question a regular team member in a notable division, whilst still not even an adult, he has also been part of a championship winning team Rcclh (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Rcclh (talkcontribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. (diff)[reply]
  • Comment – There has been some CANVASSing here by the article creator (all three !voters so far). I remain unconvinced that the subject meets standards for inclusion and will not withdraw the nomination. 5225C (talk • contributions) 16:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC), amended 16:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - Quote from Canvassing article page = "In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions", That is all that was done so please don't take offence at the fact that other editors disagree with the nomination for deletion. Motorcycle speedway is a major world sport and these editors are probably some of the best informed on the subject. Pyeongchang (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • I didn't say what sort of canvassing it was, I merely noted it for the closing administrator. Odd assumption to make. 5225C (talk • contributions) 17:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • Another quote from WP:CANVASS: Vote-stacking: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a userbox, user category, or prior statement). One of the four users you messaged about this discussion has a userbox identifying themselves as a fan of speedway, another two you have had prior interactions with about the topic confirming you had at least a strong idea of their opinion, and the fourth literally has "SpeedwayInfo" as a username. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  07:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Netherlands and Poland. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  07:18, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A "keep" closure was overturned at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 October 30 * Pppery * it has begun... 15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.