Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Herr (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Herr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a perpetual minor league player (ten+ years without a major league appearance), and does not pass any of the relevant notability guidelines for athletes or baseball players. Any news coverage is local coverage from the Lancaster Star, which isn't particularly surprising, as he plays minor league baseball there. kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. kelapstick^(bainuu) 21:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. kelapstick^(bainuu) 21:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable career minor leaguer. Northern Antarctica ₵ 03:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm gonna say that this guy meets GNG by basis of the sources HBWS mentioned in the previous two AFDs. Spanneraol (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Agree with Spanneraol. The articles noted in the prior AfD, plus the "Familiar name at third for Barnstormers" article that is currently in the article provide enough significant coverage from reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Rlendog (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am not going to !vote, as Herr and his father have strong ties to my local area, but I will say that there do seem to be sufficient sources, probably to meet GNG. Go Phightins! 02:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep based on the sourcing. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 21:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.