Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 NCAA Women's Gymnastics Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Frank Anchor 14:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 NCAA Women's Gymnastics Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another reversal of a redirect, with zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. Should have remained a redirect until it could be properly sourced, but since it's been challenged, we are here. Currently fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It seems we have an article for every other edition ever. That's why I thought a discussion worthwhile and reverted the redirect. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Would this technically fall under WP:CRYSTALBALL? I feel that more coverage would be released once the event actually happens. Is there a way to restore back into a draftspace? Otherwise, I agree it won't qualify currently. Mr.EugeneKrab$ (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Mr.EugeneKrab$: It starts in two days. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • @BeanieFan11: Oh, in that case, maybe more coverage will be released soon? (Sorry, new to this.) I agree with you that there are articles for every other edition: so why shouldn't there be for this one? Might need the opinion of another, older editor. I vote to Keep. Mr.EugeneKrab$ (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    I vote keep. Regional semifinals are happening now (March 29-31) and the regional finals are April 1-2. At most this article just needs references for the results. Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.