Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 WTA Finals – Legends Classic Invitational

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 WTA Finals – Legends Classic Invitational (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Exhibition events are not usually noteworthy and should simply be included in the main article. Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines Fyunck(click) (talk) 11:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: 2015 Hua Hin Tennis Exhibition. 333-blue 14:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Note that the exhibition article mentioned, while also under deletion discussion, at least has some current top 5 players in it. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Exhibition events are not usually noteworthy?! Please see Category:Exhibition tennis tournaments or Category:2015 tennis exhibitions. 178.94.166.186 (talk) 11:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with Fyunck(click) that it is not notable to have an article of its own. Alternatively, its content might merge with main article. SOAD KoRn (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines appears to suggest that an exhibition can be notable if several top players participate, and three of the four players are former World No. 1. clpo13_(talk) 16:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.