Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Cotabato City bombing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Cotabato City bombing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is only a few sentences and past its creation time with no expansion. This is WP:NOTNEWS and the content can either go on List of terrorist incidents, January-June, 2013 or on some page of the insurgency in the Philippines.

Related concurrent nominations:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 2013 Beirut bombing

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Krong Pinang bombing

Lihaas (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to demonstrate or make any claim that it will have any lasting significance, it therefore fails the inclusion policy. It received news coverage because it was a news story. LGA _talk^edits 20:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. NOTNEWS exists because local papers will write about boring and unimportant local events just because they need to fill their pages with something. This story was covered by essentially every major news outlet in the entire world. Xrt6L (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 00:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Major events, tons of coverage in reliable sources. Xrt6L (talk) 17:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep Im with xrt6l on this one. --BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now, while the best option would be merging it into an article about the insurgency in the Philippines. Mass murders and terrorist acts aren't that sort of trivial/local news events which fall under NOTNEWS. Cavarrone 06:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We have an enormous page about this car bomb in the US that didn't even go off. Though I agree with the sentiment that if more becomes known (in a definitive way) about the context for this bomb, it may be reasonable to incorporate this into a larger article. groupuscule (talk) 16:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is more than just a routine event.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.