Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Bihar Maoist attack

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Timeline of the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency. (non-admin closure) J947( c ) (m) 20:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Bihar Maoist attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is very short and can easily be put into in the Timeline of the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency page. Sources are good but the page is extremely lackluster and small and only says an attack happened, when it happened, who died, where it took place and who did it. There is nothing else said about it. It also fails to specify exactly how it happened and the reaction, etc. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 02:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • DeleteMerge - Unless more time is needed to gather these sources for a possible merge. I would !vote merge outright but there isn't really anything to merge from this stub. Wikipedia is not news and this is an example of an incident that received a brush of news without any significant analysis.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.