Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Lone Star Conference men's cross country season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Lone Star Conference men's cross country season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My previous draft-ification of this article was reverted. Ludicrously incomplete (only team coverage is Abilene Christian), and no sources suggesting notability. References were a results database and Abilene Christian athletic press releases. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As far as I can tell we don't even have an article on Lone Star Conference cross country in general, and I see no evidence that the 2012 season in particular is notable. Meters (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The general subject does not seem notable with only incidental coverage outside primary sources, so highly unlikely that an individual season is. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The topic in general does not appear to be significantly covered in reliable sources, and there is no indication that a particular season meets any criterion for inclusion. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks adequate sources and seems to only have notability off of one event, an article in regards to a season does not seem fit in this scenario, especially since there's no general/base article. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 19:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.