Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Asian Indoor Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was consensus to keep in some form, but whether through keeping under this title or merging to another article is a matter for further discussion elsewhere. Bencherlite ^Talk 10:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Asian Indoor Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Since these games were never held and the Asian Indoor Games no longer exist, I don't see how this subject can be notable. Papaursa (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep If the concept of the Indoor Games tournament is notable, then this 'phantom' final event is sure to be. There must be plenty of news coverage of its cancellation. ╟─Treasury Tag►You may go away now.─╢ 12:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Asian Indoor Games, there's not enough material to warrant its own article (particularly since it's a cancelled event) and plenty of room to mention it in the parent article.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 17:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or a Merge This event was moved to 2013, as the 2013 Asian Indoor-Martial Arts Games, because of crowding of the OCA's schedule. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 03:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to Asian Indoor Games. If there was info on the process of awarding the games, then it would be a keep, as it is, merging it might be good. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge, per above, if there was information about reasons for rescheduling it would be a keep, as it is I see no harm in merging a mention and redirecting to retain edit history. Bob talk 22:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to Asian Indoor Games. Neither article is very long, so a merger is very possible. I don't feel comfortable with keeping the article as it is now, but it certainly passes WP:Notability and WP:Verifiability so it should stay. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.