Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Doodhipora killing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that while this topic might be suitable for a newspaper, its lack of lasting significance suggests that it may not be suitable for an encyclopedia. Mz7 (talk) 08:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Doodhipora killing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See no coverage for this incident beyond WP:NOTNEWS. Despite the article has presence on Wiki for years, the failure to gain any notability justifies delete. My Lord (talk) 16:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Abundant in-depth coverage from several reliable sources. Incidents such as these typically lead to investigations, trials and lengthy discussions. NOTNEWS does not apply. 23:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Eastmain (talk • contribs)
• delete article created by SPA following the recent news coverage of that time. But further evidence overtime has proven that subject totally fails WP:NOTNEWS. Sdmarathe (talk) 05:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with above. Lack of notability and significance. Kraose (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per WP:NOTNEWS Ankit2 (talk) 10:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails to meet WP:RS criteria (and WP:NOTNEWS as cited by other uses above). Out of the seven sources cited, at least four do not even meet the criteria for being reliable sources. --RaviC (talk) 08:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per WP:NOTNEWS Article about 4 civilians killed in crossfire between army and militants, and then ongoing case nothing that makes it notable. The incident got expected mention in the media. But this is not enough notability for WP:EVENT (I clarify that I have been a significant contributor to this article)--DBigXray 11:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As per WP:NOTNEWS. Bharatiya29 18:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NOTNEWS , WP:ROUTINE and lacks WP:LASTING . Sadly these type of incidents are routine in the Kashmir conflict and most cases there is no followup..Further this involves the Indian army and it comes within Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act and is seen as a Army operations and there is no followup .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-NOTNEWS.∯WBG^converse 06:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.