Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003 Van Nuys Courthouse Shooting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2003 Van Nuys Courthouse Shooting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tragic but a case of WP:NOTNEWS. No indication of long term notability Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks lasting RS interest. Coverage is the standard crime, trial and sentencing cycle. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - horrifying, but thanks to the National Rifle Association, this was all too run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTNEWS --Jersey92 (talk) 02:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Another overheated cable news story which only existed because of another overheated cable news story; little coverage besides that and standard in the grand scheme. Nate • (chatter) 03:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete With no inline citations and phrases like Fearing for his life and a fusilade of bullets and bullet-riddled Curry, it reads more like a short novella that was supposed to be published in a true crime magazine, rather than an encyclopedic entry. Isaidnoway (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Run of the mill event of no enduring historical significance. Reads like an essay. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.