Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000 World Masters (darts)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to World Masters (darts). Only the 2000 World Masters article will be redirected, nominate the rest for them to be redirected. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 23:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2000 World Masters (darts) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and contextless list, no links to other articles, unencyclopaedic. There are several other articles with identical structures 2001 World Masters (darts), 2002 World Masters (darts), 2003 World Masters (darts), 2004 World Masters (darts) and 2005 World Masters (darts) and I assume that the outcome here will apply to all Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - These articles do require cleanup, but it's not a good reason why to delete. Cleaning up the articles will nullify the nomination. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - Personally I believe some WP:TNT's in order here, Anyway I can't find any evidence of notability - Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. World Professional Darts Championship covers everything with nice tables. Pax 06:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect all to World Masters (darts) until someone turns them into properly sourced, readable articles. The World Masters is undoubtedly a sufficiently important competition (and it's not the same as the World Professional Darts Championship by the way Pax) that articles by year could be feasible, but they're just a mess at the moment. --Michig (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note. Only the 2000 article is AfD tagged. The others haven't been bundled into this discussion so should not be considered part of this AfD. --Michig (talk) 13:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect all to World Masters (darts). Notability for each year is debatable but certainly possible, but if they are deemed sufficiently notable it would be better to zap these and start again anyway, as these are badly formatted and completely unsourced. As Michig says, this AfD should only apply to the one article as the others have gone all week with no AfD tags. If this one is deleted, the others can then be nominated en masse and properly tagged. Squinge (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.