Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1987–88 Bradley Braves men's basketball team

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Needs work, but meet inclusion criteria. (non-admin closure) So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 23:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1987–88 Bradley Braves men's basketball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NSEASON as it is primarily statistics and lists of players (and the list of player is itself incredibly incomplete). Given the team's performance that season there is likely an article to be written about the topic but this is not it. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. AFD is not cleanup. This article needs work (alot of it) but not deletion. Dammit_steve (talk) 08:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Per the nomination, ... there is likely an article to be written about the topic but this is not it. However, policy WP:DEL-CONTENT says that we generally do not delete notable topics merely due to content issues. Barring a statement that WP:BEFORE showed GNG was not met, I'd suggest this AfD be withdrawn.—Bagumba (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Let's make it a redirect until such time that a policy and guideline compliant article can be written. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is certainly a suggestion you can make if the article isn’t improved during the AfD process. Rikster2 (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's also a valid AfD outcome. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.