User talk:Rau J/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions with Rau J. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 1

Archive 2

All Pages:

1 -  2 -  ... (up to 100)

What do you have against storyline infos? Their issues can't have articles here! Rtkat3 (User talk:Rtkat3), 8:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Why did you revert my addition of Category:Fictional elderly martial arts masters from Iroh? --Ghostexorcist (talk) 00:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I confused your edit with something else. Sorry. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure, but I think Avatar: The Last Airbender needs to be looked over. Maybe not necessarily in a FAR, but in some way, because it has changed greatly since its promotion. Any thought? — Parent5446 ^{(t n c e m l)} 01:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's mainly what I meant, we need to fix the damage that vandalism has been doing to the article. It is very minor but I just wanted to mention it. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c e m l)} 02:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M joined X-Factor in vol. 4 #2 of the series.

BTW great job on expanding the X-Factor page! BuXom19 (talk) 03:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is sourced, by the main source at the top of the table. It's unnecessary to link every single individual episode page on MSN, when you can click their episode list and then just click on the respective episode's title for the detailed information.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 00:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to ignore the guideline. While I believe the film will get made within two years given Shyamalan's track record, numerous Hollywood projects can get stuck in development hell. Secondly, what little information there is on the project is effectively being summarised in the show's article. Alientraveller (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well leave him alone. He's allowed to remove comments from his own page, bad-faith or not, and he's only digging himself into a deeper hole by trying to ignore us and do whatever he wants. Once somebody runs by AIV he'll be blocked, and then he'll be forced to listen, at least for a day or two. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rau J!
We thank you for uploading Image:Banner 2.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not intending to be rude, but you synopsis of Raven Rise misses key points of the story line. Also, my description length of 1100 words is nowhere near the 1762 word count of The Quillan Games, an article with which you don't seem to have a problem. R.A.B.19 (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I have noticed over the past month or two that you have diligently reverted the continuous downpour of unsourced edits to the Avatar articles, specifically those involving unsourced episode titles. I really think you deserve this award for all the work you have put in so far. — Parent5446 (t n c k e l) 18:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 18:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar: The Last Airbender has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Collectonian (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naw, most protection guidelines apply to Namespace. It can e protected at any level, but you prbly want semu-protection since that way you can edit it alos. The Placebo Effect (talk) ^{How's my editing? Please contribute to my editor review.} 02:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, just request it. The Placebo Effect (talk) ^{How's my editing? Please contribute to my editor review.} 02:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even without Alien Force contradicting it, the Riddance episode has the same What If style as "Gwen 10". Having it there suggests that the series actually was supposed to end on that note, when clearly it didn't. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 03:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the Race Against Time movie, also part of the same series, which is set later and directly contradicts it. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 03:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There, that should satisfy both our concerns. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 03:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The commentary at the beginning of that episode says the exact same thing as what I wrote, and that Ben 10 Week commentary makes several RAT lead ins. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 03:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stuck to the episode wording to avoid that label. Normally I hate canon arguments, but contradictions likewise annoy me, especially when they don't shove an easily reconcilable time gap in. This solves it rather well, I think. As for the Ben 10 Week, yeah, it was that marathon preceding the Alien Force premiere. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 04:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The movies are part of the show, since they're made for TV. The only contradiction they've had thus far is with Goodbye and Good Riddance, the opening of which allows one to disregard it. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 04:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use edit summaries like " DEADPOOL!!!DEADPOOL!!!DEADPOOL!!!DEADPOOL!!!DEADPOOL!!!DEADPOOL!!!..." etc. They tend to stretch the edit history page, making it harder to read. —  scetoaux (T|C) 19:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I am removing the DeviantArt logo from your talk page and userpage. This is a non-free image, intended for use only in articles. Use of non-free images in userspace is specifically disallowed. —  scetoaux (T|C) 19:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! :) —  scetoaux (T|C) 19:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you go under "my preferences" and check the box that says Raw signature then you can add Wikimarkup to your signature, which allows you to change the font using HTML, among other things. You'll have to add the links to your talkpage and userpage manually, though. —  scetoaux (T|C) 19:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Rau J, Why on earth did you redirect my articles!!! The Adventures of Captain Underpants and The Adventures of Captain Underpants: Collectors' Edition are different to each other! You would need a VERY big section in The Adventures of Captain Underpants to describe The Adventures of Captain Underpants: Collectors' Edition! 58.104.161.111 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP REDIRECTING MY PAGES! Editor18998 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 03:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I started this article and I knows a lot abite the functioning of the band, as I am the president of the Flobots fan club here in Boca Raton FL JeanLatore (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being part of Wikipedia and contributing to comics articles. I just want to note that the other editor is correct — it's "a U.N. peacekeeping force", not "an U.N. peacekeeping force". See this example from The New York Times: [1]. With thanks, --Tenebrae (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/esl/esliart.html

http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/a.html

I can produce more. You will find NO professional style guides that say it's "an U.N." The only ones that say flatly that it's a before consonants and an before vowels fail to address the issue we're talking about. MMMMMMMM (talk) 09:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC) P.S. And now that I've seen your note on Tenebrae's talk page, I feel guilty for beating a dead horse. Sorry about that. MMMMMMMM (talk) 09:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you would use an before an acronym if it starts with a vowel sound. It's a USO-sponsored benefit but an OSI-sponsored benefit. MMMMMMMM (talk) 21:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, an acronym starting with "a 'u'" (yep, you said a before U) begins phonetically with a consonant (the hard y): US is pronounced "yoo ess." MMMMMMMM (talk) 03:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't mean this facetiously: Is English your native language? If not, that might explain this confusion. In English, the letter U is read "yoo" when naming individual letters from the alphabat, but there are other languages in which that's not the case. MMMMMMMM (talk) 03:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why are you so hellbent on excising important info from the article? you, like a military barber, are continually cutting the article down to mere nothingness, almost bulleted points, rather than a coherent, flowing, and the inspiring prose I need to get this bitch up to FA status. JeanLatore (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• it is sourcesd, sometimes. Plz. stop inserting your own secondary and unverifi-able opinion as to the meaning of the song. Who are you to say what the meaning is? JeanLatore (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah uh I dont know about that source. Where are your soucres? I am more like thinking that its your own personal interpretation of an objective facts really. Such as it is has no place in the article JeanLatore (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot cite the "meaning" of the song by referencing the song itself. Any citations sir need to be from secondary sources, and reliable ones at that. Plz. keep in mind even if you claim to have "heard" those lyrics in the song itself, your repeating/communicating the lyrics is a form of original research as well in that you are merely communicating what you think you heard. Each word, nay each verbal sound, you "hear" whilst listening to the song (or even reading the printed lyrics) is processed in your brain before being passed on, thus subjecting it to your own personal biases, experiences, interpretations, and inherent biases. See Hobbes or Jacques Rousseau on language if you want to know more about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeanLatore (talk • contribs) 00:51, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comment on the talk page sir. JeanLatore (talk) 01:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or I will take this matter about Handlebars (song) to WP:ANI. JeanLatore (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm taking this to ANI. and spending the weekend draughting a policy proposal on the use of audio-visual primary sources. This simply cannot remain status quo. JeanLatore (talk) 01:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a brief complaint about your actions on ANI. Feel free to respond. JeanLatore (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. :) —  scetoaux (T|C) 22:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And what have you added to the article of note? JeanLatore (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

soz 'bout gettin' all mad at u 'cus of the redirection! Hey! u r friends with darkspots, me old enemy! say soz 2 him 2 4 all the trouble ive given u guys! plz forgive me!!Editor18998 (talk) 07:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I technechily(or however you spell it) DO own the pages you said I don't because started them and I am the only one ever edits them!Editor18998 (talk) 01:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to capitalize the C in Marvel. Doczilla _STOMP! 02:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1) Why can't people on the Secret Invasion page understand that not every skrull ever is part of the Invasion. Very infuriating sometimes.
2) Can I steal the image from the top of your talk page and add it to my userspace? Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking this "discusion" back to WP:ANI. Please try to remain civil and refrain from being snippy. JeanLatore (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Parent5446 ^{(t n e l)} 17:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC) I am requesting feedback here: Wikipedia:Editor_review/JeanLatore. Thank yu. JeanLatore (talk) 01:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a "request for comment" on your actions and behaviour. You should respond here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Rau_J. If the community does not find your comments acceptable, I must warn you that you may be facing a block or a case brought against you with the Arbitration Committee. Thank you and have a pleasant evening. JeanLatore (talk) 01:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, are you going to respond? JeanLatore (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond in the "response" section. Thanks ,JeanLatore (talk) 19:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must say why are you reverting yet ANOTHER fact about the song as "OR"? haven't you learned your lesson about what and what is not original research? I must also say that you should take the lessons of the RFC to heart, you had 2 outside views against you, which technically I could use to open up a formal case against you with the Arbitration Committee. All I am asking is that you can edit in a civil manner. JeanLatore (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man how are you. I just wanted to say i hope that we can get over that last tiff and work together to make this article featured status.. with sources, man! JeanLatore (talk) 23:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

would you be interested in proposing a "peer review" of Handlebars to get it to "good" status? JeanLatore (talk) 02:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would fail miserably at AfD. There's no way it could be justified, since it's almost completely repetition of the Omnitrix article. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 22:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem mate. The ip 24.143.226.138. Does this always. Look further in history of 2008 in film you would see how many times i had to fix the table. But i don't want to blame him/her atleast the person is doing something useful. I don't want to say anything wrong to that person as long he/she is helping. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:). There is a lot of people who does not understand how the table works. I myself found it tough how it worked so i had to do operation to see how it works :D. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, i though if i got the info into the section then it would at least give others a place to start. If i get time in the next few days i will try to do some of the rewrite myself. --- Paulley (talk) 07:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yea i got the issues somewhere so i might have another look through. Have you read 1-45 before because they are really good.. by far Spider-Man is the best Ultimate ongoing, i mean to make 115+ issues you'd have to be really. --- Paulley (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea i just got a hold of the new TV series, so im gonna check it out. Also the new arc is an adaptation of the video game so we should hopefully see ultimate beetle too. --- Paulley (talk)

Yea... i didnt know that until someone pointed it out to me here when i was told to do it for the Michael Van Patrick article. That's why i re frame from adding too many "fictional character biographies" mostly cus i think if it says "fictional" at the top of the section then there is no need to add issues, so lately i have been putting "Character biographies" and adding the issues especially if an article has very little out-of-universe material. ---Paulley (talk) 13:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, its very handy. --- Paulley (talk) 14:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Parent5446 ☯ ^{(message email)} 12:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit summary about that section blanking. I'm not a big fan of excess civility for the sake of civility alone, but checking that guy's other edits, it's clear he's no vandal, but a footnote/citation wikignome. He's doing some good work. I left him a polite note about hte blanking, but even I think you were a bit too 'vandalism snarky' about his edit. ThuranX (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Parent5446 ☯ ^{(message email)} 22:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I almost blocked you a few hours for this (and someone else may yet do so). Please don't do it again, thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a minor point, well may be not that minor...

While it is true that a major reduction can be challenged as needing consensus, so can a major rework or addition.

BBiA has effectively done that when he reverted Darknus823's major change and expansion of the template. Darknus823 was bold, BBiA reverted, you've returned the favor, twice now.

How about explaining on the template's talk page why you feel the recent members lists, and only those lists, should be in the template. Before adding them back again.

- J Greb (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, though it may still be a useful topic to hammer out on the template's talk page. - J Greb (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any comments for [2]?--SkyWalker (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Here is the coke. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, I hate injections. When i was at hospital i had to take 14 injections per day for 20 days. DO you know how terrible it was?. --SkyWalker (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So lucky me lool. You should have been in my place then. --SkyWalker (talk) 06:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2), without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mallerd (talk) 19:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (unintentional vandalism/test) You say it is valid, but it's not. You say it cannot be helpful to the article, if the information is retrieved, it will be helpful to the entire Wikipedia project. Now stop reverting and leave it be for everyone to know. I shall post this along with the revert. Mallerd (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Remember me? I used to lurk around the A:TLA project (though not as much as you have) Fancy seeing you at Ben 10 too! *waves* =D --Secretss (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you are an active editor on Avatar-related articles, and I spotted the episode pages as a potential Featured Topic. I have listed the requirements below:

I think that if we can bring this back to FL, Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) up to GA, and either Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1) or Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2) up to FA, then we can get a featured topic on this subject! A Very interesting prospect indeed: Current Status:

• List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes
• Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1)
• Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2)
• Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)

Required Status:

• List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes
• or Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1)
• or Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2)
• Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)

If you need any help, I could gladly review the articles above and attempt to reach GA and FL/FA status for them! --haha169 (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from deleting the page, Suki. For your revert of the Avatar template, do not remove Suki from considering the page hasn't even been up for three hours. If your looking for an improper page try Ty Lee. Usercreate (talk) 17:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page had nothing but a few text which meant nothing. Usercreate (talk) 17:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You look, you don't revert edit of the template page when the series put Suki back into the show. The discussion has already been made. Usercreate (talk) 18:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look nothing, you need to look at series, and when you do you find out that Ty Lee and Mai are not in the series anymore and there are not major character anymore.Usercreate (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does matter, if you don't care then leave the pages alone. This discussion is over, any other response from you will be deleted. Usercreate (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop reverting on my page. Usercreate (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I say its been over a month, I mean its been over a month debate upon this issue. No, Wikipedia is not a democracy, but you can be outvoted when others agree upon other conflicting guidlines. Open your eyes, as she keeps reappearing, clearly there will be more real world information. Whats the difference between hers and any other members' articles. State them.Sυρєrıor ^{(Reply!,Contribs)} 14:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know how the whole changing from an article to a list will effect the season pages, I've never seen it done before. They will obviously have to go through the FL nomination process. If you want I'll help with the List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes, we should be able to model it after List of Lost episodes. Blackngold29 02:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we could always work on the intro while we're waiting. But if nobody replies for a few days I think we can go ahead and remove them. Blackngold29 02:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a sandbox we could throw all this into? Mine's kind of tied up at the moment. Also, any sources you could find will help. Blackngold29 03:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, we can base it off of List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes, List of 30 Rock episodes, and List of Lost episodes. I think we should completely re-write the intro (it definatley needs expansion), and a recap for each season to start with. I'll add the list itself as is and we can trim the recaps off later (although the 30 rock list does include them). Blackngold29 03:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably wouldn't hurt to leave on on the Avatar WP's talk page too. Blackngold29 03:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Parent5446 ☯ ^{(message email)} 21:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Parent5446 ☯ ^{(message email)} 22:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a little different from normal, but I have an idea for the DVD tables in the main Avatar list article. Instead of making three separate tables, we can make one big table. I currently have a sample in my sandbox (though the colors need to be changed, it still gives the basic idea). If we want, we can also put Region 2 in there, etc. — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(message email)} 00:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I gotta say, that looks really cool. Unique as well. I've never seen that. My only complaint is the blank row that is left from Season 1 Volume 5. But it is just a sample. Rau's Speak Page 00:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on it for a little while and give you a better copy. — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(message email)} 01:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to it. Rau's Speak Page 01:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lolz. No problem! There's actually a map on the Mozilla Firefox article showing the amounts of downloads per country. You should check it out, as well! (Firefox 2 really should remind you this stuff, huh? I learnt it from Facebook. Facebook told me to get Firefox 3. Kinda odd...) --haha169 (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the map's gone. It was removed during an apparent renovation of the article. There's one on the Firefox site, though. --haha169 (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...wow. I need to get my eyes checked. :P --haha169 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a rewrite up at my sandbox of the Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) and I'd appreciate your input on it. Thanks. -- Chickenmonkey ^X  sign?  19:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. I removed some things for multiple reasons: redundancy; the lead is supposed to summarize the entire article but the current version merely repeats information, WP:UNDUE; the positive comments about the show are given undue weight in the current version, and the current lead mentions information (such as the hiatus) which probably shouldn't be in the lead but if it is in the lead it should definitely be gone into more detail in the article, which it isn't in the current version. I would have just edited these changes into the article and been done with it, but it's under peer review and I didn't want to make these kind of changes right in the middle of that. I may just do it, anyway, though.

I've never reviewed anything before either; so thanks again for taking a look. -- Chickenmonkey ^X  sign?  20:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is looking good. Feel free to add stuff. Don't make an article just yet...I'm planning on sending this one to WP:DYK. :P --haha169 (talk) 04:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inspiration from what? I listed bunches of stuff there...--haha169 (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... That's quite an interesting connection. See if you can find a publication about that. I'd love to add some non-Asian influences into the section to balance everything out.--haha169 (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something stating the connection. Btw, 've left the reception section in a very odd state. Will you read the articles and re-shape them into groups of paragraphs? --haha169 (talk) 05:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm logging off now. I'll answer any questions immediately tomorrow morning. --haha169 (talk) 05:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you mind proofreading my work and adding a "plot" section? Also, which name do you like better: Sozin's Comet, or Sozin's Comet: The Final Battle?--haha169 (talk) 16:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then. I'll do the move. --haha169 (talk) 21:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fixes. :) --haha169 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know that this is a bit quick, but do you think Sozin's Comet is ready for GAN? IMO, it should be, since all you really have to do is fix all the problems thrown at you, and it passes...but I wanted your input as well. --haha169 (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to notify you that the guy who's been giving us (at least me) headaches on the Suki article has been blocked for sockpuppetry. --haha169 (talk) 00:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe I just noticed. He re-added comments to my talk page - comments that I had archived. Annoying... Never knew such a connection. Oh well. Anyway, I'm noticing vandalism for Aang and Katara is up again, since its semi expiry. Could you help with it? --haha169 (talk) 01:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How are you so sure? I've already listed them at WP:RfP, and if it doesn't pass...we'll just wait. --haha169 (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, I don't want to maintain it. :P I have other stuff to do. :) --haha169 (talk) 04:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned in the talk page that the formatting for this article looked odd - I've had a go at a clean up...

I'd be interested in any suggestions/complaints you have about the changes. Thanks.87.102.86.73 (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mai-Boiling Rock.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. I added some stuff into the new section of the Bending in Avatar: The Last Airbender article. I do tend to meander and was waylaid by other responsibilities, but did not use OR. The stuff added by an anon after me did constitute OR, and you then nuked both edits by reverting to your own revision.

Either I need a refresher course in the definition of original research, you jumped the gun - which happens to everyone but is worth making an effort to avoid - or both. Can you tell which it is? --Kizor 11:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually like Kizor's edit. The tweaking was really great work. But in my time at Wikipedia, when a massive amount of anons edit on an article with a history is disturbance, I don't check all of them individually, and if even one edit is is purposeful distrubance, I might accidentally revert all of them. --haha169 (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, haha169. As I said: reverting valid edits happens, but still sucks. --Kizor 16:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of it was OR. You also removed a source and added POV. To break it down:

1. You removed the source for the title.
2. With out a statement, the climax is an interpretation, POV.
3. Just because the lion-turtle taught it to Aang, does not mean that it is its "spiritual animal teacher." That's OR. And that's just your edit, not counting the ip's. Rau's Speak Page 12:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Apparently the source was added and the animal teacher mention removed after I started editing, and #1 and #3 happened because of either a browser-based screw-up or a hurried error on my part. You were right to fix those despite the collateral damage, so thanks. I can't agree to #2 as easily, though. Your message gives the impression that any uncited description beyond the specific events is POV. I'd be right with you if the subject was contentious and that description was used to advance a position. As far as I can tell, there is no dispute about whether the scene takes place during the climax or not.

Being too strict about sources for undisputed statements does become a hindrance. We don't need to cite that the Earth is round each time its curvature comes up in geography. I have been told to provide a reliable medical reference for the claim that people's heads don't explode by themselves.

Finally, if it suits you any better we can call the scene a "culmination" instead of "climax." --Kizor 16:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sozin's Comet: The Final Battle, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

You didn't create, but you helped expand it greatly, and I thought you should know if you hadn't already. :) --haha169 (talk) 22:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Rau, I left a note on the Avatar episode's talk page a while ago regarding an interview conducted by the Malaysian Star, but forgot to leave a link :P. I put it up now, and perhaps you could find a good location to put the information? --haha169 (talk) 00:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. I added some stuff into the new section of the Bending in Avatar: The Last Airbender article. I do tend to meander and was waylaid by other responsibilities, but did not use OR. The stuff added by an anon after me did constitute OR, and you then nuked both edits by reverting to your own revision.

Either I need a refresher course in the definition of original research, you jumped the gun - which happens to everyone but is worth making an effort to avoid - or both. Can you tell which it is? --Kizor 11:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually like Kizor's edit. The tweaking was really great work. But in my time at Wikipedia, when a massive amount of anons edit on an article with a history is disturbance, I don't check all of them individually, and if even one edit is is purposeful distrubance, I might accidentally revert all of them. --haha169 (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, haha169. As I said: reverting valid edits happens, but still sucks. --Kizor 16:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of it was OR. You also removed a source and added POV. To break it down:

1. You removed the source for the title.
2. With out a statement, the climax is an interpretation, POV.
3. Just because the lion-turtle taught it to Aang, does not mean that it is its "spiritual animal teacher." That's OR. And that's just your edit, not counting the ip's. Rau's Speak Page 12:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Apparently the source was added and the animal teacher mention removed after I started editing, and #1 and #3 happened because of either a browser-based screw-up or a hurried error on my part. You were right to fix those despite the collateral damage, so thanks. I can't agree to #2 as easily, though. Your message gives the impression that any uncited description beyond the specific events is POV. I'd be right with you if the subject was contentious and that description was used to advance a position. As far as I can tell, there is no dispute about whether the scene takes place during the climax or not.

Being too strict about sources for undisputed statements does become a hindrance. We don't need to cite that the Earth is round each time its curvature comes up in geography. I have been told to provide a reliable medical reference for the claim that people's heads don't explode by themselves.

Finally, if it suits you any better we can call the scene a "culmination" instead of "climax." --Kizor 16:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can't say where the climax is without an RS. If you try, it's your interpretation of where it is. Which, if I'm not mistaken, is POV. And why not just call the scene "the end of the battle with Ozai" which it was. Rau's Speak Page 00:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask for clarification before answering that, please? Are you saying that you and/or others disagree about whether that scene occurs during the climax, or that you and/or others don't disagree that it occurs during the climax but we still need a reliable external source for that statement?

This may seem irrelevant but I assure you, it isn't. --Kizor 06:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rau, in case you haven't notice, when have you ever seen "Video" and "Game" capitalized in the title of an article? Let me show you some examples: Kung Fu Panda (video game), Battle of the Bands (video game), Dead Space (video game), Star Wars: The Force Unleashed (video game). Do you see Video Game capitalized? Unless it's part of the title of the game like Family Guy Video Game!, Video Game shouldn't be capitalized. --Naruto134 00:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"was resolved" is fine, but I still like "Climaxed" better. My question, however, is how is "climaxed" POV? Climaxed (Climax (narrative)) literally means the highest point of a story. I'm not sure how that can be POV. --haha169 (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I understand. A radical interpretation of WP:OR, but it's not a big problem. Not a fan of debating over something like this. Keep up the great work. I'll leave the debating between you and Kizor - I'm not that great at debating anyway.--haha169 (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on Aang. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 02:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported them to the 3RR page for their multiple revert violations on Aang, Katara, and Zuko. However, I am unsure if they will block them since they were not given the 3RR warning after their 3rd revert. I left a warning on their page before reporting them, but it might be too late. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, but the 3RR page states "you should ensure that the "other side" is aware of the three-revert rule, especially if they are new, by leaving a warning about the rule on their talk page". The admins over there appear to be very picky over this sort of stuff. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keyblade Mage was blocked for a 24 hour period. He apologized and asked if we can forget this ever happened. Why did they blocked you for? You didn't break the 3RR rule. They might as well block me too. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 16:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I'm pissed about it. I was going to contest (using the reason you said, and the fact I told him to go to the talk page), but I'm not feeling to great right now, so I'm using the 24h as a wikibreak. Rau's Speak Page 22:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just went and copyedited the summaries in the Season 1 list, as I am hoping to bring that up to FL as well. However, since I am absolutely useless at coloring syntaxes, would you mind re-coloring the DVD volume sales to match with the style used in the main "List of episodes" article? I would appreciate it greatly. Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 18:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, would you also do the same with Season 2 and Season 3? I'm working on copyediting those lists as well. --haha169 (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:P Lol. Copyediting is essentially copying the article into a word document or something like that, and reviewing it. Some people even print it out, (but I don't, since I'm an environmental activist), and proofread it. They then re-add it. Helps with biggger, though less, edits. [3]. --haha169 (talk) 19:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at The Simpsons (season 1) as a standard...but I'm quite disappointed. In my opinion, the Avatar season articles are in better shape than that. We should easily pass FL if that list got passed... --haha169 (talk) 19:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've listed Season 2 for peer review, since I think that list is in the best shape. (I copyedited least there). --haha169 (talk) 19:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for answering my questions. I promoted Sozin's Comet to GA status!

While I'm here, I'd just like to mention that, if you have a spare wikiminute, you're free to improve Odwalla, my current project, any time you want! ;) Intothewoods29 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mai-Boiling Rock.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ty Lee-Boiling Rock.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not yet qualified to nominate List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes at FLC. Personally, I think that it is ready. We can close the peer review and nominate. I've given it a run-through with checklinks, and everything came out OK. --haha169 (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per article, yes. I've only made a total of 14 edits to that list...so I don't qualify. You, on the other hand, is the editor who contributed most to the list (edit-wise), after User Placebo Effect. --haha169 (talk) 21:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FLC. Follow the instructions on the top of the page. Any questions, ask me. Good luck! I might drop in now and then to help out.--haha169 (talk) 21:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait...one sec. Do you think we should close the PR just yet, or wait a few days? --haha169 (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is: We get to choose when to close the PR. Peer reviews usually don't just end...unless the nominator just leaves it there for weeks, then a bot comes. But the nominators, or people like us just close it. I'm leaving you to decide this stuff - since you're more familiar with the article's status than me. --haha169 (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I'm aware of Featured Candidacy polices quite well. If you have any questions, you can always ask me. --haha169 (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...Wait. So do you think that this list is ready? 'Cause if you say it is, I'm qualified to post it at FLC. But the PR question still remains. All-in-all, I doubt that anyone else will leave a peer review now that it is off the log. --haha169 (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've closed the PR and submitted to FLC. --haha169 (talk) 01:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are we deleting these pages again? They each appeared in about 10 episodes and actually played major roles in several episodes. I'm not saying they are major characters, but they were seen enough times to get their own articles. They came on the show at about halfway through the show.

Suki on the other hand appeared in the movie and about four episodes outside the movie. A couple of these appearances were pretty brief. I can arguably see why she might be deleted.

As for the rest of these characters who some call for article nomination they either don't speak (Momo) or appeared in way too few episodes (the Combustion Man). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.60.95 (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because they lack notability. Check the talk pages of the articles. One of them has it. Rau's Speak Page 23:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am incredibly sorry. I've got certain things going on this week, and I've only been able to log in in the dead of morning or late at night. Sorry for being so inactive at FLC. --haha169 (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, of course they'd change their vote after you address their comments. There is no point in opposing if you're reasons for opposing are no longer valid. Some people might change to neutral because they don't think the article should pass, but can't come up with more statements. That occurs often as well. But on the Avatar FLC, I find it odd that he struck his oppose but didn't change his vote. I'll tell him about that. --haha169 (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, which is why I'm asking Matthew. He's not responding though. --haha169 (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, I just saw it. Great, it also uses the transcluded one which means its USTV dates. Everything's set. :) --haha169 (talk) 00:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the nomination go? I can't find it on the FLC page and it wasn't removed when I checked history... --haha169 (talk) 00:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All the other "special attention" ones are still listed. Just Avatar is missing. It wasn't promoted or archived, as far as I can see. It wasn't removed by vandalism either... --haha169 (talk) 00:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. It's still there, but refuses to be transcluded due to length. --haha169 (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ya. How come this doesn't happen at FAC? --haha169 (talk) 00:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC discussions can get much longer than this, and at twice the speed than that of today. Imagine the rate of discussing of what just happened, multiply that by two and under the span of 10 hours. That's what happens to some FACs. --haha169 (talk) 01:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't believe I kept up with that either...and I did it by myself; with only a little bit of outside help. This time, I had you and Nuclear - it was easier. :) Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Super Smash Bros. Brawl. --haha169 (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rau, ever since you added the "Chapter" column here, Season 3's box has been having issues with me similar to that of Season 2. Perhaps you could take a look and fix it? Thanks. --haha169 (talk) 17:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you remove the "dos" from Joaquim dos Santos, then the table can be fixed. --haha169 (talk) 03:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== Ozai in avatar ==

hi rau j I'm the one who keeps adding that Ozai is a type of unseen character. What makes you think he's not? His whole face is never seen in the first two seasons —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.109.148.121 (talk) 16:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But we see him plenty of times. Just because you don't see his face, doesn't mean you don't see him. *SIGN* 20:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rau J - I have to go out for half-an-hour, but when I return please just give me five minutes. I will be able to make everything appear as it should, following the style guidelines set out by WP:MOSTV, the setup and usage from {{episode list}}, while retaining the colours from the previous set up. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 02:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluding Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1) means that we lost the Pilot episode. But I have no idea how to include the pilot episode in that list since it technically doesn't have any verifiable plot summary... --haha169 (talk) 05:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a move protect only -- it's not likely that the name of the page is ever going to need to be changed. Also, it's one of the ten most-edited pages on Wikipedia, so move vandalism would be particularly visible. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, if that were ever needed. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly notice to let you know that I nominated Season One of Avatar for FLC. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 05:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, my bad! Don't quite know how I got that wrong, please accept my apologies! --Ged UK (talk) 10:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never tire of seeing that comic strip :) Cheers! --Ged UK (talk) 10:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, this just a friendly notice to let you know that the FLC failed as no consensus. I'm planning to renominate again soon though, and I was wondering if you could contribute to a review of the article before I do so. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if you had some time to help me with my Twisted Kaiju Theater article. I'm trying to get it more in line with Wikipedia's accepted guidelines. If you had time to give it a once over and some suggestions, I would really appreciate it. If my link doesn't work, use the search function. Thank you, kindly!Shin-Goji (talk) 01:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't quote me on this, but I think the reason the person removed the protection template is because the page is no longer protected. The template does not actually protect the page. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I might be thinking about the Aang article, but I think I remember someone removing the protection from the Avatar page sometime ago. Yes, I agree he should have noted the page was no longer protected. They might be an admin. Perhaps you should contact them to see if the page is indeed no longer protected. If so, the template is unneeded. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He states he is not an admin on his user page. However, he may know if it was unprotected. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which article are you talking about? Can you give me a link? I've just performed so many edits in the last few hours... Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 23:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I see that the article's semi-protection expired several months ago but the article remains move protected meaning I was wrong to remove that template. I apologize. Thanks for undoing my mistake. You are correct that removing/adding protection templates does not actually change the protection level; only an admin can do that. Right now, anyone can edit that article including IPs and new accounts. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 23:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that we have finally gotten one of the Avatar Season lists featured, I was wondering if you wanted to help me do a focused effort to use season one as a "template" to make seasons two and three FLs. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back after a long wikibreak and am incredibly happy to find one of the season lists as FLC. I have taken a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes/archive2 and, personally, I think all issues on the FLC have been corrected. I'm in no position to wonder if there are any advanced coding issues, though. I was wondering if you feel the main list is ready for another shot, or if we should re-format the entire thing? --haha169 (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's all good; you don't have to help me. I just needed someone else's view, preferably someone who has been active on the list itself (since its a requirement for FLC). I'm not nominating it either; I haven't the time. But I will once Christmas rolls by and Nuclear hasn't done so yet. --haha169 (talk) 03:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

haha, thanks for the info. :D --haha169 (talk) 03:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I understood what you meant. :D --haha169 (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wow. I'm really sorry. I turned in for the night and checked this morning and saw your message. Glad to see that you fixed it on your own, though. :D -haha169 (talk) 13:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there my Airbending friend! The peer review is waiting for you here. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just wanted to ask if you could take a look at Season 2's FLC and do some of the points that I was unable to. Thanks! - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kick-@$$ Aang.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've started a consensus discussion on the edit conflict on Red Hulk here. Can you offer your opinion on the four points there? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 07:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Batman with Green Arrow and Blue Beetle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-314 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(msg email)} 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-315 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(msg email)} 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-316 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(msg email)} 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-317 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(msg email)} 03:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Banner 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Specatcular Spiderman Intertitle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ShamrockFury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Shamrock's Fury.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rau J Banner 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Bean Flag.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Gravitation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Updates & Messages For Active Participants in the Marvel Comics work group

• Current message (25/1/2020)

Greetings to you all & a great weekend. I took the iniative to send this mass message to you all because I observed from the article on Elders of the Universe that certain key members of the Elders of the Universe have no article of theirs and most glaring is that of Gilpertpedon/The Runner. I believe subject has become notable enough for a stand alone article & it would be a great idea for someone in possession of a picture of the runner which is their own work (as to avoid image copyright violations) to begin the article. Then the rest of us contribute to the article’s development.Celestina007 (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings to you all & a great weekend to you all. I want to use this medium to remind us that certain imperative actions such as the under listed actions still need to be attended to

• Review Category:Marvel Comics character stubs and merge to List of Marvel Comics characters as appropriate.
• Review the image at Category:Comics images lacking original published source/Marvel to provide original publication source information (title, issue, cover date, artist(s))..
• Collect categories, resource links, and templates.

And most imperative;

• Recruit interested editors who have shown interest in our Marvel community.

---

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]