User talk:Prokopenya Viktor/Archive3

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

hi there. i'm currently updating the steve rushton page and it says its not appropriate and you did that. may i ask why it is not appropriate? i'm trying to add references also. please help! Ihearttherush (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Ihearttherush. Thanks for the registration. Your edits violated Wikipedia policy (Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons) as it contains unsourced claims about a living person. Unfortunately, I have to remove such content immediately.

Unsourced or poorly sourced controversial claims about living people are strictly forbidden on all Wikipedia pages. In addition, all articles must be neutral, verifiable, encyclopedic, and free of original research. Editors who continue to introduce unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living people will be blocked from editing per Wikipedia policy.

Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Please, find some site-sources for your edits and then you can add your text. --Prokopenya Viktor (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sheraton Doha Resort & Convention Hotel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Sheraton Doha Resort & Convention Hotel and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I added tag {db-author} with the following explanation: "this article should be deleted before I will be able to find additional reliable sources" --Prokopenya Viktor (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Sadly, someone removed the Speedy Delete tag and trimmed the article into a stub. But, in my opinion, it made the article even worse. Do you want to put it up for speedy delete again, or should we try to salvage it? Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Ecoleetage, I restored the article with new references. Please, look it through. Is it acceptable now? If not, I will add deletion-tag again. Thanks --Prokopenya Viktor (talk) 14:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, but it is still a major problem. You are not quoting independent news sources -- you are quoting the hotel's marketing materials, which fails WP:RS. I would recommend a new request to have the page deleted. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I just put a new G11 tag on it. You are welcome to add the db-author tag, too. Unfortunately, the hotel does not currently meet Wikipedia notability standards. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

OK --Prokopenya Viktor (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

If I can also suggest that you try to fix the Clipper Harbor article you just created? You are using the yacht club's web site as a reference -- that is not proper for reference purposes, though it is okay as an external link. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The article has nothing to do with the hotel. In fact, the hotel is barely cited (one very brief mention). I would challenge it. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

• I have finished my edits to the hotel article, and added the New York Times reference you mentioned. You are welcome to make any improvements to it you wish, but please try not to add excessively promotional text. --Eastmain (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sheraton Doha Resort & Convention Hotel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheraton Doha Resort & Convention Hotel. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, I cannot see that article has not improved, and I am expanding the discussion to get a wider consensus. I genuinely wish that your request to delete the article was respected. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Duncan Clinch Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Jeandré, 2008-08-01t11:54z 11:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Query about nomination.

Reply. -- Jeandré, 2008-08-01t13:00z

A tag has been placed on Yaringa Boat Harbour Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 13:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

• There's a problem with the reference - I'll sort it out and come back to you in a few minutes. JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

• There was a missing ">" character in your first reference, and that screwed up everything that followed. If you have problems with that kind of thing, a useful check to work through is that every <ref> is matched with a </ref>, all spelled right.

The reasons I tagged the article can be found in What Wikipedia is not, particularly WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDIR. I don't think "Wine is available at the restaurant by the glass or bottle" and "Unlimited free launching & retrieval services of your yacht or power boat by trained, caring staff" are really the sort of things an encyclopedia is here to publish - in fact I hesitated whether to use a {{db-spam}} tag for advertising, because a lot of it reads like an ad. Even if trimmed back to a more factual statement, it doesn't seem to me to satisfy the notability requirements of WP:ORG, the real test being, has someone independent of the organisation found it interesting enough to write about. As far as I can see, the Ross Probyn reference is irrelevant - it's about the same area, but it doesn't mention the marina at all, unless it's "in 1975, a marina (was) under construction"; and the other just says there's a pump-out there, which is hardly "significant coverage". However, it's not my decision - we'll see what an admin thinks.

One other tip - when you post on a talk page, it's useful to end your message with four tilde characters ~~~~, which the system converts into a signature of your user-name and the time and date - like this: JohnCD (talk) 14:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Battery Park Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 13:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Viktor, whatever process you're using to create all these articles is lifting content directly from the sites you're referencing. Even if it's okay to do that, the continuing result is going to be non-notable articles that provide no better information than what is already on the official sites. The articles you're creating may be a good framework for other editors to add to and help with referencing, but no one will get the chance if the articles get deleted as quickly as you create them. Flowanda | Talk 23:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Green Cove Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on La Conner Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on La Conner Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Eagle Harbor Marina, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.parks.wa.gov/moorage/pumpout/locations/pumpoutdetail.asp?pumpNo=32&Search=Find and http://www.eagleharbormarina.com/. As a copyright violation, Eagle Harbor Marina appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Eagle Harbor Marina has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Eagle Harbor Marina and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Eagle Harbor Marina with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Eagle Harbor Marina.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Alamitos Bay Marina. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The Alamitos Bay Marina is largely copied and pasted from http://www.longbeach.gov/park/marine/alamitos_bay.asp where copyright is clearly stated. When contributing to Wikipedia, please do not copy sources and please write in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Carillon Point Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The Carillon Point Marina article is copied from http://www.parks.wa.gov/moorage/pumpout/locations/pumpoutdetail.asp?pumpNo=62&Search=Find. The Washington States Park site clearly states that its text is copyrighted. Again, please stop copying sources. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Carillon Point Marina. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

• The text you restored was a word-for-word lift from the Washington State Parks website, where copyright is clearly stated. The infringing text has been removed again. Please do not put it back. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Duncan Clinch Marina, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.mrboating.com/brokers-and-marines/marines/detailinfo?id=291891063551 and http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10365_10884_18317-44293--,00.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Duncan Clinch Marina and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Duncan Clinch Marina with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Duncan Clinch Marina.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Duncan Clinch Marina/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Duncan Clinch Marina saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Carillon Point Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Duncan Clinch Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mayalld (talk) 15:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated Duncan Clinch Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Clinch Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 18:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated Carillon Point Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carillon Point Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Haulover Beach Park Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Haulover Beach Park Marina and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basement12 (T.C) 01:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Bremerton Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Bremerton Marina and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basement12 (T.C) 01:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Arabella's Landing Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Arabella's Landing Marina and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basement12 (T.C) 01:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Arabella's Landing Marina, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Arabella's Landing Marina is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Arabella's Landing Marina, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated Arabella's Landing Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabella's Landing Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)