User talk:ProfessorCoffeeBeans

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Add a few great sources than linking to various profile pages. See WP:BOMBARDMENT Google search, Apple Music, Crunchbase are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhik Choudhury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abhik Choudhury, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ProfessorCoffeeBeans! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Abhik Choudhury, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 07:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ProfessorCoffeeBeans

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sdrqaz, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Abhik Choudhury, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sdrqaz}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sdrqaz (talk) 13:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhik Choudhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhik Choudhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sdrqaz (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ProfessorCoffeeBeans. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith I see you have blocked me for using two different IDs from my phone and laptop. I didn't know it wasn't allowed and sincerely apologize. Sdrqaz, I read all your pointers & respectfully want to bring to light a few things about why this page shouldn't be deleted. This person's isn't a singer-businessman. He is a columnist and songwriter. As a columnist like any good journalist who have their wikipedia page for public credibility he should be looked with the same lens no? He is a contributor for 11 global publishing houses simultaneously. I have even shared news stories from 4 different countries where he is quoted.

When columnists, editors and journalists Wiki pages are made, aren't they made through the work they do or what's been written about them. They do the writing no? I just checked the Wiki page of five editors with less than 2 backlinks of something written about them, but filled with work done by them. Heading editorial of international news in the middle east etc. Ex. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mihir_Sharma I understand why this page is being deleted just would really help me in understanding this criteria for future.

Is the problem that this person is also a strategist and guest faculty? Kindly educate me for future, would be gratified. thank you.

ProfessorCoffeeBeans (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(RoySmith, you may want to watch this page) Given that this seems to have been a good-faith misunderstanding of our policies (you really should declare on your userpages that the two accounts are connected, or preferably use a single one), I'm willing to support an unblock. As for notability, I'm not convinced Mihir Sharma is notable either. Wikipedia is a volunteer service, and we can't look through all the pages. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked the ProfessorCoffeeBeans account. Please just use this one account from now on. Also, please read WP:SOCK to make sure you understand our policies about multiple accounts. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Doritos Día de los Muertos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS, no evidence of a sustained impact

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]