Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhik Choudhury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhik Choudhury

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested proposed deletion. Singer-businessman that does not meet the singers guideline or the general notability guideline; there is a lack of significant coverage in independent sources, only passing mentions or user-generated listings (such as Spotify or lyrics websites). Articles written by him online or simple quotations are not enough, as they are not about him as a person; the quotations are not enough to satisfy the creative individuals guideline either. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn; no WP:SIGCOV about the subject. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn; no WP:SIGCOV about the subject. User:LinuxPanic ^Talk 03:28, 9 November 2021 (EST)
Delete Fails WP:BIO. Just because you had something published in the media doesn't make you notable. The article creator has very few edits which is a sign this could be an WP:AUTOBIO. LibStar (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete More *independent* sources and *significant* coverage are needed. At the minimum, the article should be tagged with template:COI. Ira Leviton (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To quote Ohnoitsjamie and LinuxPanic, Wikipedia is not LinkedIn; no WP:SIGCOV about the subject. The individual fails WP:NBASIC, and as a result I'm inclined towards deletion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.