User talk:ProBonoPublicoA90

enjoy! :D Khyati Gupta (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For being super a cool classmate in PSYA90! Keep in touch! Khyati Gupta (talk) 03:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Phonological Dyslexia at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ProBonoPublicoA90,

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a n exam room. Phonological dyslexia is a form of Alexia (acquired dyslexia) and the content of the phonological dyslexia article has to be about phonological dyslexia, and nothing else. The other problem was that most of your information was really out of date, and well behing current international research. The other problem was it was written like an essay and not an encyclopedia entry.

I would suggest that you leave wikipedia and do your assignment as an independent work, as you seem to have a very limited understanding of topic for an encyclopedia.

Just to bring you up to speed, there are two types of dyslexia. developmental dyslexia which has a genetic origin, and alexia (acquired dyslexia) which can be caused by brain injury, substance abuse, stroke, or progressive illness. Developmental dyslexia has three cognitive subtypes auditory, visual, and attentional which means that an auditory processing disorder, a visual processing disorder, an attention disorder, or any combination can cause the dyslexic symptom. Dyslexia is about having problems with a man made communication system the visual notation of speech, or about decoding and recoding the graphic symbols society chooses to represent the sounds of speech. Dyslexia is a social construct, and language dependent. As a short cut you might find the research paper listed in my Diigo Reading list and Dyslexia and reading list useful. There are more links to related research paper collections on my user page. The problem was that so much of the the contented you added was so out of date it could be be included in any current Wikipedia article. Best of luck with your project. dolfrog (talk) 19:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

if you want to continue with the phonological dyslexia article, I have already added some research papers as Further reading, and you might find this PubMed research paper collection of some use. PubMed also include more related articles and more importantly REVIEWS, when you select an article abstract. Me, I have auditory processing disorder as the caue of my dyslexic symptom which means i have word recall problems and problems using text to express what I understand, which meand that i tend not to add content to articles, but i do find the research and the citations, and I know when things are wrong. Again I hope this helps. dolfrog (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template:Did you know nominations/Phonological Dyslexia. Mspraveen (talk) 15:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• This actually already exists under Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome, but there were other issues with the article. The biggest was that the article was written like a personal essay and not an encyclopedic article. I kind of recommend going through Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology before making any huge changes to the current article already in the mainspace, as there were also issues of neutrality. I also noticed that you edited the current existing article with elements that are more like a personal essay than an encyclopedic article. Please be aware that even if you view yourself as an expert in the matter, the articles must be neutrally written to be like an encyclopedia and not an essay.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I've reviewed the nomination and I believe this is almost ready but that the article needs a few small changes. See the nomination template, where I've given the specifics. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? See the nomination template; someone is calling for those last few issues to be addressed within the next week. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ProBonoPublicoA90. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]