User talk:Namcokid47/Archive 3

Hey, the field for infobox video game syntax is "programmer", not "programming". I fixed the ones you recently did as they appeared in the maintenance category. -- ferret (talk) 22:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Thanks. Namcokid47 (talk) 22:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm wondering if you've ever watched a Let's Play of the game or even played it yourself. Because I have played the game and I can say that Highway Star in itself is not featured in the game, instead the London Stage's music starts off the the opening riffs of Highway Star and then segues off into Tchaikovsky's famous concrto. In fact, all the music in the game are variations of Tchaikovsky's concerto. You can easily compare this, there is a sample of Tchaikovsky's concerto on the wiki page linked from said article itself. As for the tune in question, you can listen to it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjaur49yziA&feature=youtu.be&t=1029 . Thanks,

You will need to show me a reliable source to confirm this information — YouTube cannot be used as a source, per this discussion. Give me a link to a reliable source that confirms that info, and I'll add it back in. Thanks. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you’d have googled you would have found other more reliable sources. For example, Giant Bomb: https://www.giantbomb.com/city-connection/3030-13232/ RAM (talk) 08:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you’d have googled you would have found other more reliable sources. For example, Giant Bomb: https://www.giantbomb.com/city-connection/3030-13232/ RAM (talk) 08:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources — Giant Bomb wiki pages are not reliable sources as they are user-generated content. Namcokid47 (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Giant Bomb is NOT a wiki, it is a competitor to Destructoid. But then again, I suppose you are too daft to validate the information on your own to see that Destructoid has posted false information. Even playing the game on an emulator or could've easily debunked Destructoid's lies. But if one article from a publication that is not trustworthy holds more weight than easily verifiable common knowledge, then there is no hope for Wikipedia, it's filled with lies, RAM (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You apparently haven't been able to find a reliable source to confirm that information, instead resulting to petty name calling and saying Wikipedia is now an unreliable site because of my doing (ironic really, considering you still edit here). If you find a reliable source that validates the information, fantastic, add it into the article. Because at the moment you are simply wasting my time. Namcokid47 (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Tower of Druaga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mr. Driller Drill Land you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 20:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Tower of Druaga you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Tower of Druaga for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mr. Driller Drill Land you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mr. Driller Drill Land for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 17:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xevious 3D/G you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dig Dug: Digging Strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dig Dug: Digging Strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dig Dug: Digging Strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cutie Q you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Xevious 3D/G you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Xevious 3D/G for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 21:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i'm still reviewing Cutie Q, but you haven't answered my question in the GA. Are you currently available to work on Cutie Q?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry. I've just been working on some other stuff for a while. Namcokid47 (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cutie Q you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cutie Q for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 02:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pac-Land you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 07:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. By any chance, does any Neo Geo Freak have interviews that mention the development of the SNK character Terry Bogard? After he became a Smash fighter, this page became visited more. There is enough reception that covers multiple areas of his characters but the creation remains as one of the shortests. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't know. Truth be told I know very little about the Neo Geo hardware or its games, so I'm not the right person to ask. There might be, but I don't know for sure. Namcokid47 (talk) 22:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vertical Force you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 05:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pac-Land you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pac-Land for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 05:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vertical Force screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vertical Force you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vertical Force for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Space Invaders Virtual Collection you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you would be able to help find sources for this article to expand its reception (as well as expand the Famitsu review)? - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 04:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 102 of Retro Gamer has a brief review that could be useful, found it when I was looking for stuff pertaining to SIVC. I can try translating the Famitsu review as it's on Planet Virtual Boy, but it might not be 100% accurate. I'll do my best though. Namcokid47 (talk) 04:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Space Invaders Virtual Collection you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Space Invaders Virtual Collection for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to ask if you could help me with linking the archive URLS for Mercury Meltdown. I would do it myself, but i just used all my data and the archive site is taking forever to load. I understand if you're too busy.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I wasn't able to archive the Engadget links as they lead to a bunch of ad-riddled redirects, but other than that it's finished. Namcokid47 (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Thanks for your help with archiving. It is greatly appreciated.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sol-Feace X68K screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Galaga you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Galaga for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I don't care if I have to say it twice because it can't be overstated, but I think the work you're doing on Namco articles is outstanding. TarkusABtalk/contrib 21:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly happy working with other editors, but this is isn't about fixing the lead. This is about fixing the "Mobile versions". Popcornduff prefers having it shorter on an already short section. I also have a new job, so i'm gone from fixing these articles for an additional 9-10 hours. So if you haven't seen me fix the lead, or been editing less, that's why.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 00:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know. You need to change the class for Good Articles after you promote them. They do not automatically update then you promote. GamerPro64 04:36, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones, exactly? Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 04:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made this mistake too once.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 04:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave Sol-Feace as it is now. I plan to do something with its article in the future ;) Roberth Martinez (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you plan with it, if you don't mind me asking? Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 01:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Thanks for participating in the campaign to improving Dreamcast video game articles. Your hard work is not unnoticed. Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 07:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if I collected sources for an article about the character, would you be interested in writing it? I want to find a justification for there to be a category for 1982 video game character introductions, haha. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 07:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I can give it a try. It's Pac-Man-related, after all. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 13:13, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I figured you'd be interested, haha. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 19:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, if it has any relation with Pac-Man or Namco there's no way I wouldn't wanna work on it. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 22:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, just to let you know, I'll post any sources I find here. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 06:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pac-Attack you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How is the article treating you? That article is quite a challenge to work on based on my experience with it.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 17:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Blue Pumpkin Pie: I only just noticed that you posted this on my talk page, and I guess I didn't get any notification on it. I've been having a bit of trouble finding reviews for this game that aren't just casual mentions of it in other sources, so it's made me lose some motivation into completing this. If you wanna try finding some, be my guest. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 16:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. I can do a minor search here and there. I'll see if i can find anymore, but you did a good job on it from what i can see.Blue Pumpkin Pie ^{Chat Contribs} 16:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Gtr. Errol, a Spanish-langauge Wikipedian who looked that you're already reviewing Giygas to be a GA. I'm contacting you because as the primary reviewer, you must acknowledge if someone else is interested in giving a second opionion. I've experience in improving videogame articles, so I would like to give my impresions in this one, if you agree. Thanks for this. Greetings! --«[Gtr.]» Errol 16:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtr. Errol (talk • contribs)

Do you believe theres enough coverage to create a Pac-Man Arrangement article?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 08:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not, sadly. There was a discussion from two years ago that ended with consensus to merge it with the Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2 article based on lack of notability. I also haven't really found any reviews for it either while digging through the web. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 13:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pac-Man Collection you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pac-Man Collection for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ace Driver you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ace Driver you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ace Driver for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ace Driver you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ace Driver for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This website displays Sony as the publisher: http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/9364/Pac-Man-World/

While this site displays Namco as the publisher (Although the back cover says "Published by Sony Computer Entertainment Europe. A Namco Product.") https://psxdatacenter.com/games/P/P/SCES-00934.html

I'd classify SCEE as the publisher in Europe as Third-Party titles on the PlayStation use an SLES number, while first-party published games (Sony published titles) use SCES numbers.

Luigitehplumber (talk) 13:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those sources are reliable. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 14:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What sites would you classify as reliable sources for publishers? Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 15:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pac-Attack you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pac-Attack for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed the GA and Nintendo Life review [1] is actually written by the staff member Dave Frear, so he wasn't just an user [2]. It should help the article and reception table a bit since it seems indepth. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pac-Attack you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pac-Attack for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's a shame. If i wasn't so busy recently, i would have been fixing the Reception for you. there are some sources that i don't have access to. If you could provide me the text for the ones with no URL, i might be able to assist you and you can re-nominate it.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Starblade: Operation Blue Planet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Starblade: Operation Blue Planet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Starblade: Operation Blue Planet for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 15:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Space Chaser flyer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have noticed you have nominated some video game articles for GA reassessments in the past (all of which I agree with actually), so decided to come here. I came upon Ancient Trader just now. After posting Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#Indie_Game_Reviewer because of the reliability doubts, there is also another huge problem, development section. It seems it's reliant on one source from XboxHornet, which doesn't seem reliable too. Another problem is that even the archived versions of it don't have the article, so it's all unverified at this point, which would cause a removal per WP:V. And without a development section, a GA is unlikely. Any opinions? Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:39, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

XboxHornet itself is by no means a reliable source, but the interview can still be used since the information is coming straight from the development team. Even with that in mind however, and like what you said, the archived provided by the source is basically dead and can't verify the information, so it pretty much makes the development section alone fail WP:V, which in turn makes the article itself fail the GA criteria. I'd say you should go forth with a GAN for this. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 22:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soldier Blade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Soldier Blade you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soldier Blade for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 04:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Soldier Blade you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soldier Blade for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 04:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Namcokid47, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, JOEBRO64 02:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Jet Set Radio and Lumines: Puzzle Fusion still need to be reviewed.Blue Pumpkin Pie ^{Chat Contribs} 19:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, I completely forgot about them. I'll look at Lumines today, maybe Jet Set Radio as well. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 19:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NO problem. thanks again.Blue Pumpkin Pie ^{Chat Contribs} 20:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gator Panic logo (Japan).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	"Outstanding" is an understatement if I were to describe your work at WP:VG. You've done so much in so little time, and I can't wait to see what you've got in store for 2020. Keep it up! JOEBRO64 14:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words! I appreciate hearing others liking my work around here. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 17:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]