User talk:Iune/Archive 10
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
2009 TD 1 (Atlantic)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/01-L_2009_track.png/220px-01-L_2009_track.png)
Done. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- If I recall correctly, we cannot use UNISYS data, as it is non-free. That was the whole impetus behind the creation of the track map program: to create public-domain imagery that was unencumbered by copyright restrictions. For that same reason, I cannot create track maps if I don't know the source of the text, as we can't tell whether it is libre or not. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 21:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- I probably can, but that would be a long-term project... there's way too many. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 22:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: If you have any spare time...
Sure thing, I should be able to get them done by tonight (Eastern US Time). Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Re:2009 PHS
That was a really careless edit of mine, I forgot that 01E isn't named yet. But, isn't the next storm on the list is Hurricane Adele of 1966? Thanks for pointing that out.Darren23 (Contribs) 20:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Did You Know problem
Hello! Your submission of Tropical Storm Cristina (1996) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 21:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Track request
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/30/Kathy_1966_track.png/220px-Kathy_1966_track.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Marie_1966_track.png/220px-Marie_1966_track.png)
I've checked the tracks against the ATCR and they didn't make it across the dateline while tropical. But, here's the first track regardless. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- No problem :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #27
The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the WikiProject's progress and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers June 2009. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the editors
In recent months, the project has become increasingly inactive; with only a few active participants, we need your help for the upcoming hurricane season! Feel free to contact Hurricanehink (talk · contribs), Juliancolton (talk · contribs), Jason Rees (talk · contribs), or Cyclonebiskit (talk · contribs) for more information. Thanks! Storm of the month ![]() Tropical Storm Linfa formed out of an area of low pressure on June 14, the storm briefly attained tropical depression status before degenerating. By June 17 the system regenerated in the South China Sea. Slowly tracking northward, the storm intensified, attaining severe tropical storm status on June 19 and peaking in intensity the following day. On June 21, Linfa made landfall in Fujian Province, China as a tropical storm before weakening to a tropical depression. In Taiwan, outer bands of the storm produced significant amounts of rain over southeastern areas of the island. Along the western coast, rip currents resulted in the drowning of one person. Six hikers also were reported to be missing. In China, torrential rains triggered flooding that destroyed 100 homes, killed one person and left six others missing. In all, seven people were killed by Linfa, with another 12 missing, damages in mainland China were estimated at ¥655 million (US$95.8 million) and agricultural losses in Taiwan reached NT$400 million (US$12.1 million). Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month ![]() The member of the month is Cool3 (talk · contribs). Though only a new member, Cool3 has contributed hundreds of sources and hours of research to several articles, two of which are now featured. The project thanks him for his high-quality work. New members In addition, three users re-joined the project after being listed as inactive: New and improved articles
Main Page content
Article statistics
Project News As of 01:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC), there are three featured article candidates; see the noticeboard for more info. A discussion is ongoing at the project talk page (link) regarding the naming of unnamed tropical cyclones, such as 1978 January subtropical storm and 1975 Pacific Northwest hurricane. While more descriptive titles often constitute original research, official designations are sometimes ambiguous. Comments are welcome. There is also a discussion on how the project rates its articles on the importance scale. Tropical cyclones at associated Wikimedia projects
|
–Juliancolton | Talk 02:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
RE Seven...
SPAC, Aus, WPAC. Jason Rees (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- You would probbabbly find some more if you went July 07 to June 08 Jason Rees (talk) 02:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
re: A Few More Track Maps (Again :)
I'll just convert them into 1-min winds using the formula. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Dawn 1970 track.png Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Dolly 1970 track.png Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Florence 1970 track.png Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Emma 1970 track.png Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Gillian 1970 track.png Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Isa 1970 track.png Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- File:Helen 1970 track.png
All done, if you have any more requests, don't hesitate to ask :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/29/Choco_chip_cookie_bitten.jpg/100px-Choco_chip_cookie_bitten.jpg)
Cyclonebiskit (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
=) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Cristina 96
Sounds Good, I will remove it from my userpage later today. Also, this article need more impact. I have a source at [1],[2], and [3]. Instead, of using the Public Advisory use the discussion. You should have one or two of these to become a GA. Look at Hurricane Boris (1996) and all the impact it has. It should be the mirror article for Cristina, save the copied sentence. Also, I suggest not reviewing GA's anymore since Boris 96 got delisted. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home
Re: 1996 PHS
Sorry, I gave up on that as I felt it was unnecessary to write a timeline since it is a waste of time, much more than a fishspinner article. However, you may help me getting a few discussions in the met for Hurricane Alma (1996). Leave Message, Yellow Evan home
A quick thing
I've seen that rarely anyone is awake right now, so could you add Infobox Hurricane Current to Blanca, I've tried, but there's some things I just don't get. Darren23 (Contribs) 13:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello!
Great to see you 'round! :D That talk page rules thing is User talk:Dylan620/Editnotice. If you create User talk:Anhamirak/Editnotice, you can create your own notice to show when people edit your talk page. Best, Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 10:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Timeline of the 1977 Pacific hurricane season
BorgQueen (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Tapah
Remove references from the lead, copyedit throughout, and add categories at first glance. Will type up a list of more detailed comments once you've done these. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Still needs a copyedit, as there are basic grammatical errors. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I will do some copyediting of Tapah. Jason Rees (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ive done it now and i think you got confused between [4] as there was quite a few around at that stage.Jason Rees (talk) 13:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I will do some copyediting of Tapah. Jason Rees (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Sidr
Remember we use the RSMC pressure over the IBT onesJason Rees (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK Tropical Storm Tapah (2007)
Hello! Your submission of Tropical Storm Tapah (2007) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Start versus stub for a season article
Stub class for a season article is one where there is no text summary for each system. Start class means there is a text summary for each system. This rule has been around longer than I've been in the project. Has there been a change in this decision which I'm unaware of? Thegreatdr (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
SHEM BT
Wellingtons one is better to use than Nadi's see here here for a link. Jason Rees (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Retired names
Yep Rona was retired after the 1998-99 - Source - Page 29 has most of the Brisbane retires. Jason Rees (talk) 19:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Jason Rees (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
On your list of Aussie retired cyclones if you leave the brisbane and PNG lists to me since im dealing with the SPAC and theres a few that are the wrong side of 160E to be included in the list. o and im gonna merge them as Brisbane and PNG since the names are assigned by brisbane, i suggest you do the same for Jakarta/Perth. Jason Rees (talk) 17:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah though i would merge Jakartas Retires with Perth's since Perths old AOR included Jakartas AOR and theres only one retiree from Jakarta (DURGA 07)
Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #28
The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the WikiProject's progress and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers July 2009. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the editors
In recent months, the project has become increasingly inactive; with only a few active participants, we need your help for the upcoming hurricane season! Feel free to contact Juliancolton (talk · contribs), Jason Rees (talk · contribs), or Cyclonebiskit (talk · contribs) for more information. Thanks! Storm of the month ![]() Hurricane Carlos was the third named storm of the 2009 Pacific hurricane season. Tropical Depression Four-E formed on July 10, and was quickly upgraded to Tropical Storm Carlos. On July 11, the storm strengthened into a minimal Category 1 hurricane. Following a series of intensity fluctuations, Carlos peaked as a Category 2 hurricane with winds of 105 mph (165 km/h). The storm subsequently began to weaken, and on July 16, Carlos degenerated into a remnant low. The cyclone had no known effects on land. Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month ![]() The member of the month is Plasticup (talk · contribs). Plasticup was inactive for most of the winter; however, upon returning this month, he quickly resumed work. Among his recent works are Meteorological history of Hurricane Gustav, a Good Article, and Tropical Storm Gamma (2005), a Good Article nominee. Plasticup was also designated member of the month in July 2008. New members There were no new members in July. However, four users re-joined the project after being listed as inactive: New and improved articles
Main Page content Hurricane Ioke appeared on the main page in the Today's Featured Article section on July 22. Tropical Storm Dottie (1976) and Tropical Storm Hallie (1975) appeared on the main page in the Did You Know? section on July 13 and July 24, respectively. Article statistics
Project News SchuminWeb (talk · contribs) pointed out towards the end of the month that hurricane disambiguation pages are often over-categorized. Efforts are currently underway to address this. A discussion is underway at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 1987 Atlantic hurricane season/archive1 regarding the use of HURDAT as a reference. Input is appreciated. Tropical cyclones at associated Wikimedia projects
|
–Juliancolton | Talk 02:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: Moderate Tropical Storm Fanapi of 2004-05
Sure thing, I'll try and get it uploaded soon. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Keli
Just so you know im going to keep Kelis intensity as 80kts per Wellingtons BT - That said im glad you peer into my sandboxes from time to time :)Jason Rees (talk) 17:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Cyclone Rona
Wikiproject: Did you know? 02:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jason Rees (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of WASP-16b
I've declined your speedy deletion nomination of WASP-16b. "Short and doesn't really have more information to expand it" is not a valid criteria for speedy deletion. Please familiarize yourself with those criteria before nominating any further articles. You should have noticed the {{Findsourcesnotice}}
on the talk page that has plenty of sources you could have used to constructively contributed to the article. At the very least, it should have given you evidence that the topic was worthy of a Wikipedia article. Toddst1 (talk) 23:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Lake Hayward (Wisconsin)
Just a friendly note on Lake Hayward (Wisconsin). You might want to review CSD, as neither of the reasons you gave are valid CSD reasons. Ignoring that there's a lot of consensus that named places are inherently notable, A7 (the only criteria dealing with importance, which is often confused with notability) does not apply to places. For "unlikely to expand", you might have been thinking of A1 or A3. A1 (no context) doesn't apply because the article (when you tagged it) had context -- anyone could tell it was about a specific place in Wisconsin. A3 (no content) specifically excludes valid stubs, which this is/was.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- As reviewing administrator, I think Fabrictramp has it exactly right in every respect. Additionally, with respect to Robert Sawyers Sheffey, "not notable" is not a reason for speedy deletion. Any claim or indication of importance is enough to pass this deliberately very low bar. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- This speedy deletion tag clearly indicates you are not listening to the advice given previously on your talk page. As stated above please review WP:CSD before further nomination of articles. In addition, not notifying the authors of articles' nominations for deletion is inconsiderate. Your speedy deletion tagging is considered disruptive. Toddst1 (talk) 12:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- As reviewing administrator, I think Fabrictramp has it exactly right in every respect. Additionally, with respect to Robert Sawyers Sheffey, "not notable" is not a reason for speedy deletion. Any claim or indication of importance is enough to pass this deliberately very low bar. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Hurricane Bill
Very rude to redirect an article that obviously has important significance for the season. It is the first hurricane of the season thus it needs an article. The article needs to be improved not redirected. Any comments? Send me a message on my talk page. (Hurricaneguy (talk) 20:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC))
PTS
Hi Anhamirak If me or CB nudge the 1-min winds up between advisories is due to the RBT showing that wind speedJason Rees (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
2009 PTS (Vamco)
Ah.kk.thanks for the info.have a nice day...=)...User:Jpuligan_12 20 August 2009 (1450) UTC.
Joan97
Hi. If possible, could you please try to limit your editing to one account whenever possible? Thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Tropical Storm Wendy (1999)
Hello! Your submission of Tropical Storm Wendy (1999) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jason Rees (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Jason Rees (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Just in case you haven't noticed, another editor has raised concerns about your nomination. If you can't suggest a new hook, it might be removed. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Re Eliceca
I dont know - At a complete guess it was downgraded to a depression post season but i will try and find more details.Jason Rees (talk) 21:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching the Soudelour BT :) Jason Rees (talk) 10:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
How does the Infobox small hurt your eyes? I mean I know it's too small but why your eyes? 98.193.34.53 —Preceding undated comment added 20:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC).
RE NIO
The IMD have skipped an advisory yet again and thus are singing Oopps we did it again :P Jason Rees (talk) 16:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Severe weather RfC
![]() | The severe weather article is currently undergoing a Request for Comment as to its structure and organization. The RfC can be found here. |
Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Tropical Storm Wendy (1999)
Mifter (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2009 Pacific typhoon season
Hey!!! good news. User:NuclearWarfare remove the fully protected in 2009 pacific typhoon season..wohhh. we can edit again. for more info, look at His talkpage. Because I please Him to remove the fully protected.yeah...time to edit again...haha...user:Jpuligan_12 September 14, 2009 1200 (UTC)
WPTC Assessment
Hi! Since you have recently posted to WT:WPTC or otherwise been involved with tropical cyclone articles, please nominate and review pages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment so we can revive this process. Thanks in advance, –Juliancolton | Talk 14:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to join the discussion concerning the numbering of JMA TD
The numbering of JMA TD is currently disputed in [5]. You are invited to make comments.Typhoon2009 (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |