User talk:Harryprotter2003

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Godfather, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ben-Hur (1959 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I used Box Office Mojo to deduce all of that. I don't know how to cite things. I'm not convinced The Godfather was ever the highest-grossing movie in the world or that Ben-Hur was the 2nd highest-grossing movie Harryprotter2003 (talk) 11:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World War I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. The thing is I hate World War 1 and I prefer not to know about it Harryprotter2003 (talk) 10:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at War. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to List of highest-grossing animated films, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. The thing is I wanted to add movies that I thought were at one point the highest-grossing animated movie Harryprotter2003 (talk) 11:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to cause any trouble. I just wanted to add extra information Harryprotter2003 (talk) 11:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Death of Adolf Hitler, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at the article Death of Adolf Hitler on 1 March 2023‎. Kierzek (talk) 03:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Shrek the Third. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Lord Voldemort, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I swear it wasn't my intention. I just wanted to fix a mistake Harryprotter2003 (talk) 11:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Divisibility rule, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only wanted to help Harryprotter2003 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really apologize. I only wanted to share my knowledge Harryprotter2003 (talk) 07:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your edit to the Umbridge article: Voldemort is clearly the primary antagonist all through the series; each book has secondary antagonists, and Umbridge is the (main) secondary in Book V. Thank you. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 10:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voldemort is the main antagonist of the book series as a whole but he wasn't the main antagonist of The Order of the Phoenix Harryprotter2003 (talk) 10:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]