User talk:Eg224

Hi, Eg224. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 00:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you made a change to Incidents at SeaWorld parks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, leave me a message on my talk page. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 03:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I see you've been adding a lot of information to various theme park incident summary articles, such as Incidents at Six Flags parks. I appreciate your contributions, but please remember that edits to Wikipedia, especially of this nature, must be backed up by reliable sources. In other words, you need to provide proof of the change you're making. This can be a local newspaper article, a link to their website or a reference to a book. Information from memory or from people you've spoken with at various parks would not be allowable as it is not verifiable, and it may also constitute original research. If you have questions or comments, please feel free to leave them here and I'll respond. Thank you, and happy editing! --McDoobAU93 13:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eg224! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know I am awesome Eg224 (talk) 03:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Incidents at Walt Disney World has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Incidents at Cedar Fair parks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The website you provided is not considered reliable for this type of article. -- McDoobAU93 15:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eg224! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mitchell Trubisky that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Also, please make sure to build consensus in the article talk page before repeating an edit that has been reverted. Please review WP:BRD. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me on that Eg224 (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, EG Money, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pete Carroll ‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Meters (talk) 17:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Minnesota Vikings. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Houston Astros, you may be blocked from editing. Stop messing around. Meters (talk) 05:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not looking to cause any issues here on out- I have reverted several edits I made on previous pages. Eg224 (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. If I see any more garbage edits buried amongst your real edits I'm going to assume that you are trying to hide them. Meters (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Deflategate, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. The change appears to be synthesis, deriving that their subsequent victory in the superbowl was caused by the deflategate scandal. Tarl N. (discuss) 22:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to re-word your change to Super Bowl XLIX. The youtube video (which, by the way, is a terrible form of citation) shows some commentators making that statement, does not constitute a statement that the NFL as an organization holds a belief.

I'll wait for you to fix that. Looking back at your previous edits, you seem to have a pattern of making edits involving WP:SYNTH or WP:NPOV. Whether it's just enthusiasm to express your opinions or actual intent to add text that doesn't correspond to your sources, that needs to stop. Tarl N. (discuss) 22:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you- I will find some way to cite that and leave it neutral. Thinking about it the scandal didn’t win the game for them, but my thinking was that it aided them to the game and that winning the Super Bowl was a bigger plus than the consequences of the scandal were a drawback. Eg224 (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The key to keep in mind is that your own thinking does not belong in Wikipedia. That’s hard to follow, but in general, try to keep to what your sources say, and make sure you accurately track who they are. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 03:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eg224. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EG Money, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  20:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which page was this on? Eg224 (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit on Chicago Bears. As other editors have warned you, please do not post meme or stream of consciousness type edits. Updating the record is one thing, but jokes/memes are not encyclopedic. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  00:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Am I good to re update the record? I took that info off of Bears-Packers Rivalry so I’m assuming that one was right, but it does seem weird that nobody updated the number in 3 years. Eg224 (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the record before replying to you earlier. Thanks for providing an accurate figure. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  14:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, an IP has added Warner Bros. Television on Out of Jimmy's Head even though they never produced it so can you restore the February 12 2022 edit please? 213.107.84.221 (talk) 05:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it, thanks. Eg224 (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ICON Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcade. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User_talk:AdamDeanHall, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Pavlov2 (talk) 16:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay will do thank you! Eg224 (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Flannel23 (talk) 13:34, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eg224! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.

Adog (Talk・Cont) 02:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Aaron Rodgers seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed neutral to me and part of his legacy, my bad. Eg224 (talk) 01:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eg224. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!

Note: You recieved this notification because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Harobouri ^{T • C (he/him)} 16:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Football League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eg224, just dropping a quick note to explain why I reverted this. This article is primarily about USF, not the resort. Although we do mention two of the other parks, we do so very briefly at the end of a sentence. It doesn't quite fit, however, to use an entire sentence to mention the 4th park, especially since it's not yet open and this article doesn't talk about its construction (causes a WP:DUE concern). After it opens, we can simply add it to the same sentence without taking up too much real estate. Happy to discuss further at Talk:Universal Studios Florida if needed, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Eg224 (talk) 04:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Eli Manning has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, wanted to edit it after sending but was unable. Eg224 (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2022–23 Milwaukee Bucks season. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was not trying to make it one sided, I think it is undeniably an embarrassing loss for anyone you would ask outside of Heat fans. Eg224 (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’re a great contributor! Eg224 (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Scottie Pippen. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 11:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adjusting the article. I just protected it because of a big blast of vandalism. Would you mind looking over the article to see if there are any bits of nonsense that I missed? Joyous! Noise! 02:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem- thanks much! I didn’t look thru all the paragraphs but I was hoping someone would protect it. I was trying to remember how to submit a request. Eg224 (talk) 03:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, when you want to request protection, go to this page. Joyous! Noise! 03:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mitt Romney. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro was like “revert on that thang” Eg224 (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you have added a tag questioning the neutrality of 2024 United States presidential election on the page. You then went on to edit the section about which you expressed this concern. You did not, however, make a post to the talk page of the article explaining why you do not feel the article is neutral. Since you have already edited the section about which you expressed concern, please remove the tag. If you still feel that the section is not neutral, please post to the talk page about your concerns.

This article is covered under the contentious topics arbitration enforcement processes, and you may be subject to sanctions should you not be prepared to discuss such matters as banners on the article. Risker (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just took care of it- thanks for letting me know. I guess putting insight on the talk page would have been good, seemed like everyone else said everything possible though so I didn't. Eg224 (talk) 06:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]