User talk:Count Count

Welcome to Wikipedia, Count Count! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marianna251 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marianna251TALK 10:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Count Count,

I saw on the talk page for Danielle Bernstein that you asked for any comments or edits on your suggested neutral sentence from the Fashionista article. I took a stab here, based on the article:

"In May 2018, Bernstein launched a capsule jewelry collaboration with Lulu DK for sale at Nordstrom. It was alleged that the designs of certain of the pieces were copied from other jewelry designers. The pieces in question were subsequently removed from the collection."

Sorry if this wasn't the right place to message you about this! And thanks!

LordBaratheon (talk) 19:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I took the liberty to copy it to the article's talk page here, where all further discussion should happen. --Count Count (talk) 19:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I like your efforts in counter vandalism, however I would recommend checking out the WP:CVUA to learn more. Keep up the good work! ★Gooseflesh12★ (talk) 16:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am reading the AfD process page as you suggested, the page tells me to insert "{{subst:afd1" at the top of the article if I want to nominate it for deletion.

There are several articles which I would like to nominate for deletion due to the reason that none of them meet the criteria for notability as described by Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. Is the above-stated method the correct way to nominate for deletion? If not, what would be the correct procedures? Please advise as soon as possible, thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.250.173 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are no longer deleting the article text, so that is good. I just checked again and you are apparently using the proposed deletion process and not the articles for deletion process. This is only for articles where you are sure that there is no opposition to the deletion. Are you sure about that? Otherwise you should use the AfD process. --Count Count (talk) 07:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I will make the necessary edits. Thank you for the advice — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.250.173 (talk) 08:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	You've spent hours today fighting vandalism, your diligence is noted and appreciated. Thank-you! Ifnord (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Please be careful with your reverts. You actually inserted vandalism back to the page. Thanks.--5 albert square (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw. Sorry about that. I was a bit over-eager after previously reverting this subtle vandalism. --Count Count (talk) 09:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Nothing that couldn't be reverted and rev del'd again :)--5 albert square (talk) 09:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Count Count

It is all sweetness and light to receive 'Barnstars'; however, this was not vandalism. Before I report you for overzealous removal of updates, let me ask how old you are. These were known as The Asteroids for many years, and this is what I learnt them as in Primary School as a child. I'm sorry that you prefer the politically-correct name, BUT it has a history before you came on the scene. [User:211.30.179.119|211.30.179.119]] (talk) 09:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your addition because the cited source was not reachable and it seemed implausible to me that a site ending in .gov.au had a Queenslander article. Now the site is reachable again and the link apparently leads to the archive of the National Library of Australia with said Queenslander article. I apologize for this mistake. --Count Count (talk) 11:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC) P.S. Please note though that this is not an endorsement for the change you made. --Count Count (talk) 11:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit; Per your suggestion, I have created a discussion in the Silmarillion talk page. I thank you immensely as it was my first edit on the wiki and I have a good grasp on the process now.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.181.186 (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. If you need further assistance you can also visit the Teahouse. Please remember to sign your comments and to reply below the contributions of other users. Also you might have to be patient until someone replies on the talk page. If noone replies just be brave and add your edit again, citing reliable sources --Count Count (talk) 10:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Greetings Count Count,

Thank you for the notification I understand why it may seem like original research, but let me show you where the original statements are either partially or wholly inaccurate and you can decide whether my edit stays or not;

1. In 'Influences' chapter the claim that he was influenced by medieval Christian cosmology is made, i.e. the reference to the harmony of the spheres. What is overlooked here is the Harmony of spheres is a concept considerably older than its medieval Christian adaptation, as it is a concept dating back to Greco-roman societies (Classical age) originating in the 5th or 6th century before Christ.

2. An incorrect connection is made through this statement; 'The Silmarillion tells of the creation and fall of the Elves, as Genesis tells of the creation and fall of Man.' Why this is inaccurate is because of major differences in the fall of Men and the fall of elves.

Similarly, the fall of the Noldor is caused by Fëanor being tricked by Melkor. What is often overlooked is that the elves were not of one kingdom at the time of the fall of the Noldor and Fëanor can therefore not be compared to Adam and Eve in the fall of men. Furthermore, the punishment of the Noldor only affects the Noldor and is neither universal nor permanent as is understood when many of the Noldor, under the banner of Fingolfin and Finarfin, abandon Fëanor and are allowed back into Valinor. This can even further be distanced from Abrahamic influence as the Noldor are not even punished at leaving Valinor but they are leaving under free will and that the reason for their "punishment" is because of the kin-slaying of the Teleri Elves on Fëanors command. Compared to the fall of man which subsequently affects the whole of mankind and the punishment is universal and permanent.

Conclusion; Therefore I am sure that my addition of text was not original research but factual disambiguation of barely contented ideas; This is not wholly concluded as being influenced by Abrahamic dogma and should be reviewed. The following statements are under scrutiny neither an obvious nor plausible source of influence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.181.186 (talk) 09:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Left the same reply on your talk page as well) You don't need to argue your case to me. I reverted your edit, because no source was supplied. Everything added to Wikipedia must be sourced. So you just need to find reliable sources supporting your claim and cite those sources in your addition. Your own ideas, research, arguments, etc. are not a valid source however relevant or correct they may be, please read WP:NOR. --Count Count (talk) 10:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Count Count. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for thanking me. I always love it when I get some appreciation. Rock on. UnsungKing123 (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! I undid some vandalism in this article before but you dug deeper and found the changed birthdate. I appreciate it! --Count Count (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Count Count, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Hello, the user who had nominated the article for deletion and who was the only other one who participated in the discussion about it - where he behaved very weirdly - has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Since you, in contrast to him, gave very reasonable explanation why you had concerns and I worked on improving it, could you please take a look again so that we can come to a decision? Omikroergosum (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. An admin will probably still relist to generate a clearer consensus. --Count Count (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Omikroergosum (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How did you determne the original 2016 version of that massive undo? Meters (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: It became clear to me that the edit was based on an old version when I saw the introduced split section template. I then looked at the diffs between the current version and versions from 2018, 2017, 2016 versions to find out the version closest to the new version. I narrowed it down using something like a binary search. Took me about 10 minutes to find it. --Count Count (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. You did exactly what I was doing, just faster. I was just hoping there was some script to do this, but I guess not. Thanks, Meters (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Chetsford (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So that you don't lose your power. Baklava has a lot of sugar in it. Luke081515 20:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo CountCount! Das mit dem Import habe ich schon Aroner, der den Artikel auf meine Anfrage hin verschoben hat, erklärt. Der Artikel wurde nur zum Teil übersetzt, den Abschnitt über die Geschichte habe ich selbst erstellt. Mr. Schnellerklärt (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Also, issues relating to dewiki are off-topic here. If you need to you can contact me via "Email this user". --Count Count (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Count Count, sei bitte so nett und mache meinen Account in der de.WP wieder frei. Leider kann ich meinen Wunsch aktuell dort nicht selbst vorbringen, da die Sperre auch für meine Disk dort gilt, was so eig nicht beabsichtigt war.

Danke und Gruß, --Hexakopter (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Count Count! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is your bot meant to be making a bunch of test edits in your sandbox, because they keep popping up in my anti-vandal feed. Thanks, Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 06:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Zippybonzo: Yes. I was testing something, see phab:T333635. Done now. --Count Count (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove my link from the page because it I related to how to make cake that will help our users to know that how to make cake. I am Techtello123 Techtello123 (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added your link to Cake (band). That article is obviously not about delicious cake but about the band Cake. So your recipe is offtopic there. Also don't just add references in the References section, see Wikipedia:Citing sources how that works. And last of all your link does not meet the requirements of either WP:External links or WP:Reliable sources. Please don't add it again. Count Count (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So please tell me that where I can add the recipe of cake? Techtello123 (talk) 05:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add it anywhere. Your link does not meet the requirements we have for external links, see WP:External links and in particular WP:NOBLOGS. Count Count (talk) 05:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You're doing an awesome job around here especially when reverting possible vandalism... Keep it up 👏👏👏 Volten001 ☎ 16:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kunal Bahl, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The No Spam Barnstar
	For your efforts. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kindly add the other popular characters for this topic . I have valuable sources and pretty popular so the characters need to add in the topic rather than just focusing one character. [1]https://www.cbr.com/sigma-males-cautionary-tales-american-psycho-fight-club/ 103.137.160.109 (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the cbr.com article is a reliable source. You can add them yourself citing this article. --Count Count (talk) 08:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...for your anti-vandalism and spam cleanup work.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 12:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning up after me. I definitely needed another coffee (despite it being past noon here already). Count Count (talk) 12:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A good cup of coffee can definitely help keep the day moving along, no matter the time. Enjoy your coffee break. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to wikipedia as a contributor and don't know and understand much of how it works. I recently modified one page named Trading Card with one useful resource citing which has been rolled back by you. I contributed that only because I found that external source pretty useful for trading card enthusiasts like me and it seemed to have well-formatted content, nothing else. Could you please review the matter or let me know why you think this contrib as a spam? Abhijeet in (talk) 21:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your only contribution to main space has been to add the same low-quality external link to multiple pages. This is spamming. Wikipedia ist not a linkfarm, external links can only be added in conformance with clearly defined rules, see WP:EL. Count Count (talk) 05:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The contribution I made to the page is no different than the other two in the same section which lead to commercial links for ammo and lone wolf conversions as their references. This is not spam.

your note on my talk page has been duly noted. Thank you. Nuel Jr (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this website blacklisted? I see no wrong in it, only that a single idiot (sorry not sorry) used it for ref spamming. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792 It was recently globally blacklisted on meta. You can request removal from the global spam blacklist on the same page or local whitelisting at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. Count Count (talk) 15:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Count Count -- I've declined these two speedies: the U5 is not applicable as it is clearly an attempt at an article draft; the G11 is borderline -- there are aspects of AI-like writing but it could relatively easily be cleaned up. As background, there are several discussions ongoing at the moment about the merits of U5/G11s on relatively harmless, if promotional, userspace or draftspace drafts (in the light of the recall petition brought against administrator Fastily, who has deleted many of these in the past), suggesting that admins and patrollers should both strive to be less hostile towards new editors working in userspace/draftspace. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Espresso Addict, can you point me to (some of) those ongoing discussions? Count Count (talk) 08:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the recall petition itself and in the (now-closed) thread at ANI on Fastily#Fastily, as well as a few of the talk pages of admins who work in deletion. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Espresso Addict, thank you! I had since found the recall petition and skimmed through it. I see your point and will adjust my work on enwiki accordingly. My main focus is fighting commercial spam anyway. Count Count (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's nothing you are doing wrong, I'm just attempting a slight personal reset, testing being a little more forgiving of harmless autobios in userspace. Keep up the good work with the spam links! Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]