User talk:Chronikhiles

Welcome, Chronikhiles!

Hello, Chronikhiles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Tamils. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style Your first article I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 14:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)  [reply]

Hi. I see you are helping on Hinduism and India related articles. By providing references, you are embracing the principle of Wikipedia:Verifiability, however many of the references will not be regarded as Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Suggest that you go through the policy and add more scholarly references to the articles. Please let me know if you require any help. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think this is a reliable source for this information? Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 14:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should have stated that as your justification for removal. Fair enough, I'll add different sources. Chronikhiles (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Periya Tirumoli.

Titodutta (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you've made my day! Chronikhiles (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panakam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Valereee (talk) 17:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Chronikhiles! I'm always interested in articles about traditional foods, feel free to ping me next time you create one, if I've got time I'll help. Any chance we can get the transliterated names of the dish into the lead? Like at Chou En-Lai, for instance. Valereee (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep your offer in mind, @Valereee. I've added the transliteration for the beverage. Thanks for your time! Chronikhiles (talk) 06:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chronikhiles. Thank you for your work on Mātali. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Really cool article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:04, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chronikhiles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yoga Narasimhar Temple, Velachery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kacha (sage), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your comment. As someone who has been contributing to wikipedia for more than sixteen years, I am familiar with the rules and conventions adhered to here. I am proud of my work, much of which still remains in its original form. As an internationally recognised scholar of South Asian religion I am learned in many aspects of Gaudiya Vaisnavism on which I have been invited to lecture by the International Association for the History of Religions (a branch of UNESCO). As someone whose work has been read all over the world and been translated into several languages, I am in no doubt that the version of the article to which I reverted (January 29 by Doug Weller) is far superior to that which currently stands. However, I have no interest in edit warring and won't attempt any further edits to this article. yours sincerely. 86.31.37.161 (talk) 08:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@86.31.37.161 I appreciate your candour. Your credentials and expertise on Gaudiya Vaishnavism aside, I'm sure that you realise that the article of Svayam Bhagavan encompasses more than just this one tradition of Vaishnavism. It is my belief that your edit made it more Gaudiya Vaishnavism-centric, which is unfair to other traditions that have the concept, such as Sri Vaishnavism. That is the primary reason I chose to revert your good faith edits. You are obviously welcome to contribute to the article in the future, keeping this in mind. Have a great day! Chronikhiles (talk) 09:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw Kusha grass; good work. Would suggest you nominate the new aricles or 5X expanded articles you create on Template talk:Did you know. If passed, they will appear on the main page of WP in the "Did you know" section. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nimi (Vedic king), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Early Buddhism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chronikhiles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yoga Narasimhar Temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Neelakandeswarar Temple, Gerugambakkam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Vedarambha is an excellent page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoyTheKingCanDance Much obliged, thank you! Chronikhiles (talk) 08:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have read lot of pages which you have edited and the details are very good with lot of clarity. Particularly, I saw you greatly enhanced the "Svarga" page, which I was also trying to improve few weeks back. I wanted to see if you can help review a stub page that I created for "mahat-tattva" (mahat) at User:Asteramellus/Mahat-tattva. I would like to have it moved to the main wiki so that it can be used by other pages to link (and further developed by others). There is currently a page for "mahat", but it is a general term page. And when mahat or mahat-tattva term is used in other pages, I see it either not linked or linked to "tattva" page. I have been reading the Hinduism An Alphabetical Guide and while adding details for "Ahamkara", wanted to link "mahat", but page was missing. So, I thought of creating this page and add it as a stub page. I would appreciate if you can help take a look and give feedback. Thanks! Asteramellus (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asteramellus Hey there! I have previously been offered feedback that at least eight different reliable sources keeps a stub pretty immune to draft reversion, and your draft currently has one. I was able to find quite a few religious and secular sources on mahat tattva on Google Books, and I bet there's also a lot on archive.org. Adding a few more of them would be great. Do let me know once you've published the article, and I'll do my best to expand the content. Chronikhiles (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronikhiles thanks so much for guidance and quick reply. I will definitely look at sources in google books and archive.org and add more details. Asteramellus (talk) 03:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronikhiles Hi! I published the article "Mahat-tattva" (there is already a page for "Mahat" - so, I had to keep it Mahat-tattva), so you can expand when time. thanks. Asteramellus (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asteramellus I have made some improvements to the article. I think that the tone of it might need to be reworked to make it seem less like a manual, but otherwise it's pretty solid. Chronikhiles (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronikhiles Thanks. I will definitely think about tone as I work through this page and other pages. Also, as I am working on this and looking in google books, I came across couple of other very interesting books - still reading the pages available in google books, but will be trying to get from library today:

1. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Vachanamrut_in_English/e_LgDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=mahattattva&pg=PT239&printsec=frontcover
2. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Vedic_Creationism/qLe-aZfl7YEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=mahattattva&pg=PA149&printsec=frontcover
3. https://www.google.com/search?q=mahattattva&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=bks&ei=bDnpY-rvIMyg5NoP7IiGiAM&start=10&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjq1eHD15D9AhVMEFkFHWyEATEQ8NMDegQIDxAW&biw=1187&bih=630&dpr=1
4. https://www.google.com/books/edition/An_Introduction_to_Swaminarayan_Hindu_Th/-nA2DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=mahattattva&pg=PA265&printsec=frontcover

Not sure if you have read any of these books. Asteramellus (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronikhiles just fyi - noticed while reading the preface that source #1 I mentioned above seems to be a primary source translation in English. Asteramellus (talk) 20:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asteramellus I did some across the book on Vedic Creationism, but I found the analogies with psychology rather dubious. Such content might be removed if added since I believe it lacks the rigorous research to back it up. By all means, do add content regarding the conceptualisation of mahat tattva in different Hindu schools of thought, just remember to include the school as well. Chronikhiles (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asteramellus I also advise that you use blockquotes with caution and sparingly in articles, since copyright violations could get you in trouble. Paraphrasing the content in your own words within paragraphs is a good alternative. Chronikhiles (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ChronikhilesThanks so much. I will paraphrase what I have added for puranas and also when I add other Hindu schools of thought/scriptures. Asteramellus (talk) 22:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there I see you re added the vasuki image with brahma vishnu and shiva pulling the serpent. The image is wrong in case you didn't know as the trinity never came to pull the snake instead it were the other devas, vishnu became a turtle for giving balance to the mount, shiva came in the end to swallow the famous poison halala which also made his throat blue, and brahma either sat on the mount seeing everything that was happening or he just never came during the struggle, hope this helped if you find anything wrong you can always reply I will help clear your query, thank you for reading this and giving your time. Razeangst (talk) 08:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Razeangst That is nice of you to offer, and I'm sure your image deletion in the article Vasuki and that in Samudra Manthana was in good faith. However, I would like to encourage you to read up the Wikipedia image use policy. Removing a relevant image from an article because of your belief that it has a few discrepancies in not a valid reason, whatever your personal beliefs may be. I strongly advise that you familiarise yourself with the rules of this encyclopedia before you proceed with further editing. Chronikhiles (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't entirely my personal belief, i can provide sources if you want, but yeah tell me how many sources are enough to remove it. Razeangst (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Razeangst You seem to be under the impression that adding reliable sources is a valid reason to remove an image that is valid under the image policy. It is not. But if you really feel strongly that you must remove the image, replace it with an image that is an improvement over the present one. Chronikhiles (talk) 15:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohk got it Razeangst (talk) 15:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Btw how do I tell if an image has copyright or not? Razeangst (talk) 15:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Razeangst Should be fine as long as it's in the public domain. Chronikhiles (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit? Current information is completely wrong. Don't know why you also reverted my edit on Brahma. Mr.sandippaul (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.sandippaul You'll notice that I self-reverted my edit on Brahma and restored it to your version because it was an error on my part. As for Vishnu, the lead already mentions that Vishnu is Para Brahman in Vaishnavism. It's best to have succinct infoboxes. You did not offer any citations for your other content inclusion in the infobox, which is why that was reverted as well. Chronikhiles (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing references info, I see you removed reliable/references/content from many pages. Narayana-Narayana (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Narayana-Narayana Refer to the content section of WP:LEAD. The article Narayani Sena does not have an accessible overview and lacks relative emphasis as well as an appropriate opening paragraph. None of the almost two dozen sources present provide any actual authentic evidence from the Hindu epic Mahabharata that support the POV-pushing present for the Gopayan and Abhira communities. None of the sociological or economics citations that do so are relevant to this article, which is about Hinduism. Neither is the lead itself written in an encyclopaedic tone. Do you see why saying "see references" is not enough? Chronikhiles (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronikhiles I have been reading a lot about Samkhya & Vedanta and need some help in clarifying and adding content for Chit/Chitta/Citta. Few weeks back I came across this English translation of primary source "Vachanamrut" and while reading it, read that "Chitta (consciousness) is the same as Mahattattva" - Do you have good secondary sources that talks more about Chitta (in Vedanta) same as Mahattattva?

Also, I see wiki page for Chit (Consciousness) and then a page Chitta (Buddhism) - but I think it is confusing. Do you think there should be some redirect at least for say Chitta (Hinduism or maybe Vedanta) to Chit (Consciousness)? Asteramellus (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asteramellus I do not. I also can't seem to find any other sources that make this claim, so I think doing some more looking into would help before adding anything definitive. As for your other query, you could add the template for or not to be confused with at the top of both articles rather than making a redirect. Chronikhiles (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Gita Bhashya is awesome. Great job! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoyTheKingCanDance Much obliged! Chronikhiles (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I see your articles on Divya Prabandham. Very Good articles and easy to understand, Importantly References and Hymns. You know Tamil? Thankyou for Creating Articles Sriveenkat (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sriveenkat Thank you, I created these articles because I believe they deserve to be present on the English Wikipedia. Yes, I'm fluent in Tamil. Chronikhiles (talk) 03:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chronikhiles, A Small Request, You can expand these types of articles in Tamil Wikipedia. You have more knowledge in Tamil literatures You are Greatly Welcome!! Sriveenkat (talk) 03:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to expand the Divya Prabandham articles on the Tamil Wikipedia by translating content and references from this one. Chronikhiles (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks Sriveenkat (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chronikhiles, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 18:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikhil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikhil Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Vishnu is not supreme god in Vaishnavism,right? Goddess Durga is not known as jagdamba but goddess Laxmi and goddess Parvati,right? Goddess Durga is not supreme goddess in Shaktism,right? It is not Anant Chaturdashi but Ananta Chaturdashi,right? To hell with you and your biased attitude and you know exactly what i am talking about, i am outta here,u carry on with your propoganda. Hbanm (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hbanm See you. Kindly read the Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and Wikipedia:Civility when you return. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 02:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ratha Saptami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to let you know that I mentioned you in the context of the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ayya_Vaikundar discussion. Schazjmd (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Hinduism Award
		Thank you for creating Om Namo Narayanaya!

बडा काजी (talk) 20:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@बडा काजी I appreciate your good will! Chronikhiles ^(talk) 16:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What was non-neutral, i don't understand? Every edit was done according to Shaktism with reference to Devi Mahatmya and Devi Bhagvatam both of which are most important texts in Shaktism and if Goddess Tripura sundari, Goddess Bhuvaneshwari, Goddess Lakshmi and Goddess Parvati all can be referred to as Supreme Being on their respective pages why not Goddess Durga?, isn't she referred to as the Supreme being in many important texts of Shaktism? Hbanm (talk) 08:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom line is that the consensus in Puranic tradition is that Durga is not the Supreme Being of Shaktism - Adi Shakti/Mahadevi is. This is the most substantial reason I can offer. You are correct that Durga is regarded to be an important manifestation of Adi Shakti in the texts of Shaktism. This is mentioned in the lead section of the article Durga. However, it is also true that outside Shaktism, in the traditions of Vaishnavism and Shaivism, Durga is often identified with Parvati, and to a lesser extent Yogamaya. On the other hand, these traditions do not dispute that Tripura Sundari and Bhuvaneshvari are manifestations of Adi Shakti. Lakshmi is regarded to be the Supreme Being in many Vaishnava and a few Shakta texts, and hence warrants this inclusion. To sum it up, adding that Durga is the Supreme Being of Shaktism would be both sectarian and incorrect. If you are unsatisfied with this answer, I encourage you to begin a discussion of this matter in the talkpage of the article Durga. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 12:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chronikhiles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neelakandeswarar Temple, Gerugambakkam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy @Chronikhiles!

Wanted to ask for your opinion on the title of the Savitri Brata article. Would it be better to change it from Savitri Brata to Savitri Vrata or a new title entirely? Also, who makes those changes to the title?

Let me know! Chilicave (talk) 16:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chilicave Hey, so I think the title spelling for the most part comes down to how most of the article's reliable sources render it. That being said, I do believe vrata is closer to the original Sanskrit. If most of the sources do render it Savitri Vrata or it is the common name on the site, I suppose you could use the move option to rename it yourself? if not, you could always make it a requested move and get a discussion going. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 16:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronikhiles

Thanks for the tips! Much appreciated. Chilicave (talk) 17:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sir, from which books did you got the names of shishupal's sister suprabha name?? Pikkkkucha (talk) 07:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can't help you, I don't believe I added this detail to the article. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 11:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The image of Narasimha dose not seem so attracting and dose not provide a proper view so i would like to change the image of of Narasimhaswamy to portrait which looks better. Thank you Narayanan Iyengar (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Narayanan Iyengar I understand, but the one you'd like has three characters, and it is preferred to have a single person in infobox images rather than several. The present Yoga Narasimha image is fine, but I think the Tirumala one was better. If you can find a painting with just Narasimha, that would be ideal. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 16:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sure, Thank you for considering my request Narayanan Iyengar (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made ref. edits on how various denominations vary on Balarama and Buddha and the texts concerned as goodwill editsNagannaa (talk) 09:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't make modifications to existing cited content, though, please leave that be. You can add new content that specifies this difference with citations included, that should be fine. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 09:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jyoti Kalash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jyoti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ranga Panchami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Chronikhiles, Hello, I happy to say you are a great article creator, because you creates a lot if many article releated to Hindu mythology ; I really happy for that ; we are happy about your work.I hope you always creates more article releated to Indian culture. Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the well wishes! Chronikhiles ^(talk) 11:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

in Pippalada article, you deleted info about ten sons of Pippalada. But, they are mentioned in Shiva Purana. Why you delete it? Karasingam 2.0 (talk) 09:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re-add the content with a reliable source from the Shiva Purana then. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 09:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tapati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuru.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Equalwidth. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Goloka in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Equalwidth (C) 04:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True, the summary could have been more accurate. Need not have undone my edit, though. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 05:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste!

Maybe you are not the best person for me to ask this, but I see that you have reverted my edit on Nanda's genealogy, requesting a source. I must say, I personally have a lot of my edits reverted because of not having a source.

The thing I want to point out is that I got that fact from the family tree later in the article. That was basically my source. Now, what do I do if I really want to say that Nanda is Vasudeva's second cousin? (I personally find the fact itself quite "aesthetic" and not that prominent)

In general, if I have a set of facts backed by sources, can I not join these facts into one using human sense?

Thanks, BrightSunMan (talk) 08:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your point would have much more weight if the family tree were sourced. I don't see that it is. Of course, if you have reliable sources to back your inclusion, I wholeheartedly support any content you'd like to include on this or any article; this is an encyclopedia, after all. I'm sure you can look up reliable sources on Google books, archive.org or any other website that might have texts and even primary sources that describe Krishna's family (I think some Puranas do describe it at length) and supports the detail you want to add. Since I don't doubt your intentions, I will not be reverting again even if you do decide to re-add the content without a source. Have a good day! Chronikhiles ^(talk) 10:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and wondering why you took my edit to Indra‘s page down? Netjerudua (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! It appears I did not have a problem with your particular equivalent deities edit. I was restoring the infobox image that had been changed without consensus and your edit happened to get reverted as well. You can feel free to make your edit again if you'd like. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 05:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thank you! Have a good day. Netjerudua (talk) 21:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chronikhiles, I have posted on the Vamana page as per your suggestion and my own talk page in response to your message. I am not sure if you would have received a notification, but I await your response in any case. Hemmingweigh (talk) 08:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was not notified. I'll get back to you on this. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 10:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask as to why did you change the mantra from devanagari to latin? 2400:1A00:BD11:B02A:28C5:B1A8:3D8B:D9D9 (talk) 11:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the norm in the English Wikipedia. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 11:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

rather than engaging on edit warring , i have added a talk section on Lal Bahadur Shastri talk page. reach a consensus before you do anything blatantly Afv12e (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you opening this up for dialogue, but you should take your own advice on blantancy and familiarise yourself on what reliable sources are. News9live and Times of India are not, FYI. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 06:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Chronikhiles @Redtigerxyz@Chariotrider555 2409:4071:D41:5B96:8F21:6704:5C7E:272A (talk) 03:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Chronikhiles @Redtigerxyz @Chariotrider555

Devasena and sundaravalli are children of Indra, not God Vishnu, Indra children are devasena and sundaravalli, even so many puranas and Mahabharata also mentioned this source, only Tamil folk lietaure mentioned about this information, as per Wikipedia neutral point it can't be considered, be edit good faith leave and delete Vishnu Wiki page children, there is no children for Vishnu, infact Vishnu is father of everything , Vishnu is especially important to Vaishnavaism, so you should consider and add information based on Vaishnavism only, so many wrong information are found in Wiki page. Vishvarupa (universal form ) is one of the main theological source of Vishnu, but you never discussed and atleast didn't added info on vishvaroop a in Vishnu wiki page, but you add Nataraja( cosmic dancer ) for shiva wiki, why so many differences in Hindu deities, treat all are equal, even no one add neutral point in Wikipedia, very vandalism and propaganda, I didn't expect from you especially to red tiger and all shaivas,

What King kulathunga do for Vaishnavaism, same thing were happening to Lord Vishnu Wikipedia articles.

Let's see how you improvement and edit good faith.

2409:4071:D41:5B96:8F21:6704:5C7E:272A (talk) 03:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let yourself be heard through objectivity, adherence to policy, and reliable sources instead of accusations and personal attacks; learn to do so, and you might make a difference on this website. If not, all your vandalism and propaganda talk and all that you post here will fall on deaf ears, I promise you this. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 04:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chronikhiles, You mentioned Ramanuja Nutrantati's author as "Periya Koil Nambi", I think he is better known as Tiruvarangatamutanar (திருவரங்கத்தமுதனார்) rather than Periya Koil Nambi. (Some readers might get confused) Am I right? Regards, Sriveenkat (talk) 10:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chronikhiles, the edits made from this IP address to Andal and Nachiyar Tirumoli are not vandalism at all and they are legitimate edits that are made in good faith only to improve and correct their syntax, grammar, spelling, content of these two articles only and they are appropriate for these two articles only, so i tell you to revert your revert back now itself and add these changes to those articles now itself. 117.196.159.119 (talk) 06:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legitimate according to whom? You're free to open a talk page on these pages to discuss your requested changes, because these IP changes are beyond "syntax" and "grammar". Frame a respectful message when you do if you want people to hear you out, none of this "now itself" business. Cheers. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 08:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are legitimate according to everyone! These IP changes are within syntax and grammar to improve and correct these two articles in good faith only and these requested changes are needed by everyone to be on these two articles only, so they are appropriate changes for everyone to add to these two articles now. You should frame a respectful message for wanting me to hear out for discussions about these changes, not destroying my good faith edits and telling to me that they are wrong without discussing with me at all and this is no "now itself" buisness. Cheers. 59.93.10.170 (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be less reactive and more constructive and I think you might actually make a coherent point. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 15:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chronikhiles, i am not reactive and is always constructive and i made a coherent point. I am telling you to revert your reverts back now to these two articles now and restore those two versions that this IP address made to these two articles now itself only as you know how to do so. 2409:40F4:101B:97A1:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user with account named @Cosmology dreamer is continuously vandalising various articles on Hindu deities by adding a lot of unsourced, non neutral and sectarian biased information and I suspect him to be a sock of previously blocked user @god devotee.I started this discussion on the talk page of Vishnu but this sock deleted that discussion from talk page itself. Please look into this and block this sock's account. Hbanm (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

kindly request to you, plz add necessary info to vishnu wiki page such as,

Add ， Destroyer of Evil, before bestower of karma. Add, Narayana Name quote name by redirect link before The supreme being (vaishnavism) . and remove same title name in other names .

Narayana is not just another name of vishnu, narayana is another aspect and important Epithet of vishnu deity.

it is necessary to add this names, because Entire description authentic information found in this wiki article, so plz add this one

, when i edit someone reverted, so any one kindly edit this necessary neutral point by good faiths. plz edit it. @Chronikhiles @Chariotrider555 @Redtigerxyz User : Cosmology dreamer 22:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you look into the infobox images of Pururavas and Yayati. A user seems to have replaced the prev images with modern digital "illustrations". As far as I remember, a discussion regarding the use of such image occurred many months backs. Thank you, 245CMR•^👥📜 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@245CMR I have restored the previous infobox images. I do believe the consensus we've gathered regarding this matter is to favor traditional depictions rather modern digital/AI generated art wherever possible. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 03:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Chronikhiles, I added Authentic content based on reliable sources in vishnu article page, if anyone delete, then plz again reverted as it is. Thank you. Narine naresh (talk) 08:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is 100% a sock of the same master. Clear as day. Look at the language. Can you block along with Naanu neenu please, @Doug Weller:? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 10:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Chronikhiles, Sorry for troubling you. But it would be wonderful if i could know the reason for reverting my contributions even if those have proofs with them. Shaktyavesh (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaktyavesh I have responded to this on the talkpage. I appreciate your wish to contribute to Hinduism-related topics here, but copyright violations can get you blocked if done repeatedly. Do be mindful of the same. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 02:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for response Shaktyavesh (talk) 03:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]