User talk:Boneless Pizza!/Archive 19

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hey, GP. How're you doing these days? Haven't heard from you in awhile so I figured I'd just stop in and say hi. :) sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, got bored at Wikipedia these days. Thou, I check what's happening often. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 12:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I just visited the Ermac page the first time in awhile, noticed that it was locked, and soon found out why. Thanks for your help in maintaining law and order in there. Cheers. :) sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 00:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

This seems like it'd be extremely simple to find a reference for? jp×g🗯️ 19:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Can you give me a source that say wikis are not allowed in Wikipedia even if it's from reliable sources? Kazama16 (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Greenish Pickle! Also these were IGN guides about power ups not wikis, although I don't know what's the difference. Kazama16 (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

.....Oh, now finally you can talk after dismissing my advice on your talk page? See [1] GreenishPickle! (🔔) 17:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, I got frustrated finding sources and got no clue that wikis aren't allowed in Wikipedia. Deeply sorry ☺️ and thanks for your contributions to King's article. Also don't put only bare URLs take your time to make citations with full information like author, date, title, etc. Kazama16 (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Greenish Pickle!, In an article recently merged with the afd where is consensus made to know? The dogcat (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

I would like to show you my workflow for AFC so that you might understand how far I got into the review.
1: Quick fails

 A: copyvio (If it’s not huge, let the page creator have a say)
  B: Vandalism/test
 C:Attack

—Stopped here—
E: violates what Wikipedia is not
2: Main review (don’t start if quick failed)
A:notable?
B:Sourced?
C:NPOV
D:BLP
Loosely based off of this
File:Flow chart for AFC 3.1.png
Hope this helps you understand my position: I ask that you mind how your implications come off to me.
Thank you for reading this wall of text Geardona (talk to me?) 05:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ada and Leon.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Can you please check out this article so many sources and so much mess. 39.50.255.241 (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

It is time consuming and I have zero interest in that character, but maybe I'll try to remove few of them. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 22:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sans (Undertale) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

The article Sans (Undertale) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sans (Undertale) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 21:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to Sans (Undertale) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sans (Undertale) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

The article Sans (Undertale) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sans (Undertale) for comments about the article, and Talk:Sans (Undertale)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 15:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Greenish Pickle!,

I was reviewing Fruti Kola which you PROD'd and I have a request. Please consider using Twinkle for tagging pages for deletion, whether that's CSD, PROD or AFD/RFD/CFD/etc. It's a very user-friendly editing tool used by most page patrollers and many administrators because it makes the process so easy. For one thing, it leaves an informative edit summary. This is especially important for PROD'd articles because if an article is de-PROD'd, if it gets tagged again, the admin needs to see it's already been PROD'd and that is done by looking at the edit summaries in the page history. Additionally, once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", when you tag an article for deletion, Twinkle will post a notification on the user talk page of the page creator which is an important step in the deletion process. Twinkle will take care of this so you don't need to do so. Twinkle will allow you to do all sorts of other activities besides tagging pages for deletion like tagging articles for problems, reporting vandals to noticeboards, maintain a deletion log for you, set up an AFD discussion, welcome new editors, it's really invaluable once you start using it so I encourage you to give it a try. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

It's a bit tricky for me to use Twinkle, which is why I actually do it manually. Thou, I might give it a shot. Many thanks. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 01:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, could you please explain why you consider the source I put during my edit on Sora to be unreliable? That website has been used for sources all across wikipedia. Osh33m (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

@Greenish Pickle!: I just want to point out that you didn't tell me that Valnet sources shouldn't be used. You never told me that. You never told me anything, which is why I reverted your edit. I don't even know what you mean by Valnet. Osh33m (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh I see. Apologize for that. Valnet sources are like GameRant, ScreenRant and etc. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 00:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

but why? those sources have reliable information. why should wikipedia avoid using them as sources? Osh33m (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

The way you added it on reception were unnecessary. We can use Valnet sources thou, but not really at the reception section. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 22:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Greenish Pickle!, I undid your edit on Factions of Halo because a consensus was not achieved in the AfD discussion. CanonNi (talk) 03:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mushroom Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mushroom Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 23:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

The importance rating for the Video Games WikiProject requires High-Importance characters to be iconic and widely recognized outside of their series. Samus is not at this level, she is not very well-known outside of Metroid and Smash Bros. She is closer to the Mid-Importance criteria, as a protagonist of a popular series.

On the other hand, the Miis easily meet this criteria. The 3DS online shutting down has nothing to do with it. The Miis are iconic to Smash and the Wii series, as well as starring in Tomodachi Life and Miitopia, and being playable in several Mario spinoffs, among other things. They were the first Nintendo characters to get a mobile game, and they are some of the only ones to be pre-installed on Nintendo consoles. Everybody who has played modern Nintendo games knows what a Mii is. Other companies even started to copy Nintendo, like Xbox with the Xbox avatar. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I won't edit war over this so I'll only do one reversion but I do find a Mid-tier assessment insufficient. She's regarded as one of the most influential female characters, and considered the first female character to star in a video game by many, discounting characters like Ms. Pac-Man due to them being based on another character. I don't really like edit wars over importance, but that's my piece. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 23:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin and Greenish Pickle!: I am fine with putting Samus at High-Importance for the main project and task force, and I could be convinced that she is Top-Importance for game characters. I just do not see how she is more iconic than Sephiroth, Goomba, Ganon, Kirby, etc. However, I will not object to her being listed as Top-Importance. As for Mii, I do not want to edit war, but I am dying on this hill. There is a lot I could say about them, but I will save it for now. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, what do you want Mii assessed at? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

He rated Mii's importance as "Top" and I was like "are you serious?" So, reverted it into high for now. I feel like its mid but oh well. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 23:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I wanted it placed at Top-Importance. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Also, Samus isn't rated high compare to Sephiroth and etc. They were rated the same thing. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

They are currently. They are only at the same level because I brought Samus down. She was previously rated at the same level as Mario, Cloud, and Sonic. Like I said above, I am fine if you or Cukie wants to put her back at Top-Importance, I just doubted how iconic she is compared to these other characters. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

My best bet would be High not top. But, she is still well known if you have a video gaming background. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 23:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I would agree that High-Importance fits in this case. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I started a discussion about character importance ratings at WT:VGCHAR. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay, new image finally uploaded (had to do it twice due to a defect on the first one). I was also going to tell you that someone overhauled the hell out of the appearances section. Thanks for reverting it but I guess it's a sign that I needed to tighten it up myself. I'm hoping that the whole mask debacle will lead to some meaty reception in the near future. And finally an "Eek!" at the nice big reptilian creature above. :) sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 05:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

add <nowiki>{{db-author}}<nowiki> to your first image to be speedy deleted. The fact that he removed his appearance also in ''Mortal Kombat X'' is a sign that it kinda needs to be reverted. For reception, at least you got the ign one [3] and Gamespot for additional info [4] Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 05:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I'm in the middle of making edits, and I had to stop because of over-lapping with your edits. I will take a break, and return later; but if you could hold off making changes while I'm making changes? Otherwise things will get lost. If you want to undo my edits after I am done, that's super ok by me; but doing it at the same time causes confusion.

Sorry I'm slow. I'll be done soon with language suggestions and other: whatever you don't like, you can take out. Ok?

Thanks. I'll go away for a bit now. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 14:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

oops sorry, I did not see the tag here at mobile Ok not touching the article for now. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 14:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

no worries. I'll let you know when I'm done. bye — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 15:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I've finished copy edit, and removed {in use} tag. And left comments on talk page.
I did change the lead again, per your instructions: thanks!! that really helped. I also tweaked a lot in section on Japanese version of Sans, using the source for guidance: I think I got it all right!? And I did add some white space throughout, to break a little the wall of text. Feel free to change that, or anything—just trying to help make this article more super.
I did also note that the dates in the citations (starting about no. 40) are in the wrong format (not mm-dd-yy but mm-yy-dd or yy-dd-mm). If I have time, later, I may go back to try and fix dates; but this didn't stop the GAN process before, so maybe not that important for now.
Good luck on the DYKN. Thanks for your patience. Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 16:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks for your effort. I really appreciate it! I will recheck it tomorrow. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 16:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Great! Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 18:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Good, you saw my little edit, after the fact. Also made another 2 minor fixes, b/c I was told, on talk from previous article, that I misunderstood some "standard grammar" issue about semi-colons. My bad.

Also will fix 1 more sentence that's kinda too long, about PSR stuff, but I need to read source again. Want to make easier to understand/ more focused on Sans, not a little mini-lecture. Blah blah blah. Just to make it better, NO MAJOR changes: then I'm out. But not tonight. And the stuff that got added/subtracted in lead looks REALLY good. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 02:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks again =). GreenishPickle! (🔔) 02:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar: that was really kind of you. I very much enjoyed working on the article and learning about Sans. Be well. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 11:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I saw you reverted my edit. It's okay I just want to let you know that not just concept but "Appearances" section is also filled with primary sources its either a primary video game source or a book published by Square Enix. I would be grateful if you replaced them with secondary sources as much as you can. Thanks. 39.50.246.233 (talk) 02:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Its fine to use in appearances also, as long as its not excessive. If its on the reception section, it should be definitely removed. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

There are at least more than 50 primary sources in my guess. It highly relies on primary sources when its come to concept and appearances section. Like look at other video game characters article they don't include that much primary sources. It really needs some secondary sources that's why I ask you if you could do some help. Thanks sir. 39.50.246.233 (talk) 02:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hmm. Restored your the template tag now. I don't wanna spend most of my time on that article since I don't really have interest. Sorry. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Why don't you create account thou? I've seen you plenty of times, and your dynamic IP keeps changing. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm really not interested in Wikipedia because of its weird rules, but I would do some help if there is misinformation or unnecessary details in articles. Thanks for asking thou. Much appreciated. 39.50.246.233 (talk) 02:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

What kind of weird rules btw? I could maybe help you with that. Well, you know Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Video game characters is improving this generation now. Most of the listicles/rankings that does not say valuable stuff or irrelevant ones in the articles (like you're dealing with Mai) now are already removed + Most of non-notable characters ended up being merged and the growing of GA articles within the character articles. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baker family you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zombies in Resident Evil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Zombies in Resident Evil you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil and Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Zombies in Resident Evil you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil for comments about the article, and Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Albert Wesker you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Baker family you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baker family for comments about the article, and Talk:Baker family/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Mutant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shulk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 11:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Super Mutant you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Super Mutant for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Albert Wesker you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Albert Wesker and Talk:Albert Wesker/GA3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Albert Wesker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Albert Wesker for comments about the article, and Talk:Albert Wesker/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Peach 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I have been pulling my hair out with how badly written Ultraman Belial and Ultraman Tregear are. Thank you for putting them on AFD. (I have also explained why I didn't do it myself.) 50.113.53.158 (talk) 23:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

You can vote to AfD on whatever your opinion is. I mean, if you're only an IP, you can only vote at AfD, but you can't nominate articles. So, why don't you create? There's no age requirement anyway. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 03:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I already said this elsewhere, but I am 16 and my parents are unsure about it. 50.113.53.158 (talk) 03:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

"Unsure". This is just a free encyclopedia anyway, its not like they're gonna do something with your email address. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 03:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Either way, thank you again. 50.113.53.158 (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Shulk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shulk and Talk:Shulk/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bella Goth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Bella Goth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bella Goth and Talk:Bella Goth/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Per the notice when creating a review page, the current practice is to not use Level-2 headers (meaning ==this kind==) for GA review pages, and instead use Level-3 headers (meaning ===this kind===) to divide the review into sections. This stops the review from making several new sections on the article's talk page when transcluded. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Einstein. I'll recommend you to finish Dizzy's GAN thou. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 23:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

I plan on it. I have just not had much time to conduct a thorough review of an entire article lately. I will hopefully finish it tonight. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Bella Goth you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bella Goth for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

On 29 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sans (Undertale), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sans's boss theme, "Megalovania", was played at the Vatican as part of a circus act during an audience with Pope Francis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sans (Undertale). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sans (Undertale)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Look, I'm willing to go with negotiations if you want to delete an Ultraman page. But please, do it properly. File an AfD first, then provide your reason, but please make sure that you presented it reasonable and sound. If you say that "Oh, this page lacks general notability", nobody would've looked at you as a sane person. Discuss it with all the people around to convince them to agree to your reasoning.

And one more thing; Ultraseven appears in Ultraseven. He's not in the 1966 Ultraman TV series. It also shows here just how lacking your knowledge in the subject you want to focus on and not bother doing proper research.

Zero stylinx (talk) 03:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Shulk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shulk for comments about the article, and Talk:Shulk/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hey from a fellow pickle! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello there! Yours is crunchy, and mine was more on the greenish side. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 00:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For all of the work that you do cleaning up the character articles, protecting them when needed, and for helping to get them to GA. ;) Fieryninja (talk) 17:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Master =) 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 22:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Even ignoring the dubious sourcing, your edit to the Herschel Weingrod article was grossly inappropriate. If as source (any source, even a legitimate one) uses the term 'allegedly' about something, we don't cite said source, repeating the allegation as fact. Not for anything. Never. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I see your edit has now been revdelled. You may find these discussions of interest. [5][6]. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Oopsie, I won't be touching that article after that anyway. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Greetings my friend. Can you archive Shantae (character). I have been trying to archive it but fails everytime I try, so maybe you can help me with that. Have a great day! Kazama16 (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Same thing that happen to me "spamblacklist". 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 08:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

why you nominated this page for deletion? It is a main character page of series kurulus osman why you have nominated it? Bluesapphire1999 (talk) 03:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Apparently no one has been keeping an eye on Cloud Strife recently. I'm new to that article but there have been loads of strange edits. Could you have a look? Fieryninja (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Those edits doesn't look constructive, so we're just gonna revert them. It's a bit odd that the rampant IP edits thou. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

I have a feeling some of the cited content might have been deleted amongst all of those ip edits too. Fieryninja (talk) 22:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

If we can spot something we can revert it rightaway. Unfortunately, no one is interested at that article;thus no one has watchlisted it. I'm also one of those fella. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 23:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

I just wanted to let someone know that I have some requests on WT:AFD. I assume that nobody has seen them yet, but they're there. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:E1EB:7896:3BB9:E89F (talk) 22:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Replying to confirm that you saw this. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:E1EB:7896:3BB9:E89F (talk) 02:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Good Evening, the Chris Redfield article requires improvement (add references, reduce bias etc.). Why did you revert my edits? I'd like to discuss the matter with you at your talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with you. Sincerely, Mary Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 02:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Nice copypaste 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 04:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Redfield. Please do not remove information from articles that is backed up by reliable sources, gaming magazine or otherwise. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

What are you admin? HAHAHA 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 07:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm an editor. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

disrespectful comments are not allowed. see: Wikipedia:Civility Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Disrespectful comments are incivil behavior. see: Wikipedia:Civility Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 17:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

The article Bella Goth you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bella Goth for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maplestrip -- Maplestrip (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Teamspeak, which you proposed for deletion. I personally believe the page is notable because TeamSpeak is used commonly. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! MessageApp (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)