Talk:WWII in HD
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWII in HD article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 12 January 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Lt. Charles Scheffel
The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. 108.202.62.77 (talk) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex
- Followup: the treatment of Charles Scheffel was revised sometime during last three years and there is no longer a problem that way. --doncram 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
GOCEreviewed
As well as dealing with the tags on the page, the empty sections should be completed before it's worth copy editing this. --Stfg (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Development by watchers
The series is available in Netflix currently (January 2015). Not sure if that can/should be noted in article.
To me, the article's topic is clearly notable, and the article is really pretty good. I removed several negative tags that seem not to apply (maybe the article was improved since 2010), and replaced just by one: {{more footnotes}} (which calls for inline citations). Further development is not hugely needed, IMHO.
In general, can watchers of the TV series cite the series itself? The TV episodes themselves are sources, should be as legitimate as printed sources. Obviously they are primary sources of info about what the episodes contain, but primary sources can be used, with care, in Wikipedia. I think informed watchers/viewers should be able to generalize from the episodes themselves, though I am not sure how that is done in other articles. --doncram 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on WWII in HD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091028001557/http://www.history.com/content/wwii-in-hd/ to http://www.history.com/content/wwii-in-hd
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)