Talk:TIA-MC-1
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Russia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Konek Gorbunok videogame.png
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Konek Gorbunok videogame.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
screenshots/fair use
Would someone maybe please explain wtf is a fair use rationale good enough for wiki editors? I mean how one screenshot of a 30-year old game can be more fair than another? If this is purely formal, and it seems how it's dealt with, there should be a template.Svofski 11:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)