Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Peer review/Dr Disrespect/archive1" on Wikipedia
- to B-class. I think it is right now, but as @PresN: noted at WT:VG#Dr Disrespect, despite some cleanup and copyediting, which is always helpful there...6 KB (681 words) - 23:33, 1 August 2024
- history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review to help determine whether or not it is, or could...14 KB (1,981 words) - 06:31, 22 October 2018
- Shortcut WP:PR Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working...5 KB (0 words) - 18:35, 23 June 2024
- history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because extensive work by...21 KB (3,037 words) - 10:02, 20 November 2013
- this peer review is not transcluded. It is still open and located at Wikipedia:Peer review/Ring (mathematics)/archive1. Previous peer review Article...11 KB (130,623 words) - 21:41, 19 July 2019
- this peer review is not transcluded. It is still open and located at Wikipedia:Peer review/1995 Brazilian Grand Prix/archive1. Previous peer review Article...12 KB (95,719 words) - 11:52, 2 August 2009
- User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan 15:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Thanks for running the auto-review tool on this article. I believe most of...21 KB (3,338 words) - 09:44, 10 February 2023
- old peer review archived here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Salvia divinorum/archive1 Jolb 18:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Please see automated peer review suggestions...13 KB (128,068 words) - 12:02, 15 November 2023
- Previous PR are at Wikipedia:Peer review/Opus Dei/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Opus Dei/archive2. Two previous peer reviews have suggested changes for...11 KB (94,917 words) - 23:32, 10 May 2008
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...6 KB (58,222 words) - 04:05, 31 July 2013
- Wikipedia:Peer review/Cracker Barrel Old Country Store/archive1. Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review...10 KB (102,929 words) - 03:24, 5 April 2012
- third peer review request for this article. The first two can be found here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Palpatine/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Palpatine/archive2...7 KB (71,878 words) - 00:57, 24 May 2008
- Review request. The wordy drama version is Wikipedia:Peer_review/Monomelic_amyotrophy/archive1 HISTORY SUMMARIZED First I got help in the article. Monomelic...71 KB (9,450 words) - 07:50, 21 February 2022
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Evidence (section Evidence regarding Wikipedia:Featured article review/Buckingham Palace)to get out of the way and the current Wikipedia:Peer review/Ali's Smile: Naked Scientology/archive1. I did not know Durova was Cirt's mentor, or even...171 KB (21,015 words) - 22:22, 4 February 2023
- (comments can be left here or at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Cape Feare/archive1) Thanks, Theleftorium 20:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC) From experience...287 KB (39,178 words) - 05:42, 3 March 2023
- article is now stable. It's also gone through extensive copyedits, and peer review. While the article is 68 kb, the large number of references account for...5 KB (68,635 words) - 03:04, 21 December 2020
- January 2006 (UTC) Fitst peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review/Streetlight Manifesto/archive1 Second peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review/Streetlight Manifesto...4 KB (63,686 words) - 02:13, 13 May 2024
- When filing I Not Stupid's third peer review, I encountered the same problem - I was unable to move the second peer review as the first (archived) got in...282 KB (42,711 words) - 11:17, 3 April 2023
- Parapsychological Association is not a reliable source, nor are conventions peer reviewed or otherwise reliable for such major claims." Such assertions fall easily...1 KB (45,644 words) - 00:43, 1 October 2009
- this remarkable tale, which has been a GA since 2010 and was kindly peer reviewed by the estimable Ruhrfisch in the same year , in honour of the forthcoming...2 KB (124,274 words) - 22:02, 29 February 2012