Talk:Success (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

definition w.r.t. failure

The longstanding third line of this article had been

the opposite of failure

Recently it was changed to

the opposite of failure, since failure is a prerequisite for success, the true opposite of success could be considered as hopelessness.

Rather than a revert war, I bring the issue to the talk page.

Failure is not a prerequisite for success - it is possible to succeed at the first attempt!

The discussion belongs here, not on the page itself:

Failure says ...it may be viewed as the opposite of success.*
wikt:Success lists wikt:Failure as the antonym.

--Scott Davis ^Talk 09:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC) What of success is. If you get up in the morning and do what you love to do you achived success! Steven D.MIchael[reply]

STATE OF MIND IS A SECRET OR A KEY OF SUCCESS WHEN YOU MIND CONCEIVE IT YOU HEART BELIEVE IT AND YOU BODY SAY YES I CAN THAT IS SUCCESS SUCCESS ITS A BURNING DESIRE TO ACHIVE AWILL TO CELABRATION OF VICTORY AND THHE ABILITY TO WIN. SUCCESS IT BEGINS WITH YOU 2DAY 2MORROW AND ALWAYS.BY ALUWANI MASHAWANA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.210.219.181 (talk) 16:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are no any reasons for failure only a good lessons which mark the beginning of SUCCESS..

Shubham Chavan 64 (talk) 02:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion : Create real article for Success

Wouldn't it be great to create a real article for success since there is a real article for failure ? Success is such an important topic, I don't understand how it could have been ignored by writers on Wikipedia for this long ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julienre (talk • contribs) 06:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Julienre:

Done Stub created. Please add to it. — The Transhumanist 22:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success → Success (disambiguation)
Success (concept) → Success

– The general concept is by far the most WP:PRIMARYTOPIC PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move was done by The Transhumanist two years ago but then it was reverted by Bkonrad later on the same day, so discussion is needed. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In a dictionary, absolutely. But I'm not sure the page we have at Success (concept), which appears to be a blend of original research, cobbled together concepts, and some uncited original writing meets the overwhelming standard needed for a primary topic, particularly since it's only getting around half the page views.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This was a triumph, I'm making a note here, huge success. (But seriously, the concept is, well, the obvious WP:BROADCONCEPT for "success"). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yaksar. Colin M (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Showiecz (talk) 06:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the primary topic. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Concept article could use some work but it defines the primary topic, and hopefully without disambiguation it will get more eyes on it and receive improvement. DigitalIceAge (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as primary topic, but the article could use a review. --Spekkios (talk) 03:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.